Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 30477 (RAJ)

MR. RAKESH BHARGAVA SON OF LATE MR. MAHESH CHANDRA BHARGAVA. v. MESSRS. B.P. ENTERPRISES

CW/14568/2021 · 2025-01-23

Avneesh Jhingan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:3308] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14568/2021 1. Mr. Rakesh Bhargava Son Of Late Mr. Mahesh Chandra Bhargava., Resident Of Phool Niwas, Mahatma Gandhi Marg, Kutchery Road, Ajmer. 2. Mr. Rajiv Bhargava Son Of Late Mr. Mahesh Chandra Bhargava, Resident Of Phool Niwas, Mahatma Gandhi Marg, Kutchery Road, Ajmer. 3. Mrs. Jyoti Bhargava Deceased Wife Of Late Mr. Mahesh Chandra Bhargava, Resident Of Phool Niwas, Mahatma Gandhi Marg, Kutchery Road, Ajmer. 4. Mrs. Santosh Bhargava Wife Of Late. Mr. Sudhir Bhargava, Resident Of Mukand Garden, Aadarsh Nagar, Ajmer. 5. Mr. Sanjay Bhargava Son Of Late Mr. Sudhir Bhargava, Resident Of Mukand Garden, Aadarsh Nagar, Ajmer. 6. Mrs. Veena Bhargava Wife Of Late Mr. Nirmal Kumar Bhargava, Resident Of Mukand Garden, Aadarsh Nagar, Ajmer. ----Petitioners Versus 1. Messrs. B.P. Enterprises, Unit Plaza Cinema, Ajmer 2. Mrs. Khemi Bai Wife Of Late Mr. Tara Chand Bulani, Resident Of Diggi Chowk Ajmer. 3. Mr. Kamal Bulani Son Of Mr. Mangharam Bulani, Resident Of House Number 735/55, Chanakyapuri Colony, Vaishali Nagar, Ajmer 4. Mr. Yudhishtir Bulani Son Of Late Mr. Jhammatmal Bulani., Resident Of House Number 735/55, Chanakyapuri Colony, Vaishali Nagar, Ajmer 5. Mrs. Riya Bulani Wife Of Mr. Kamal Bulani, Resident Of House Number 735/55, Chanakyapuri Colony, Vaishali Nagar, Ajmer ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14267/2021 1. M/s B.P. Enterprises, Unit Plaza Cinema Ajmer Through Partner Kamal Boolani. 2. Smt. Khemi Bai Wife Of Late Shri Tarachand Boolani, Resident Of Diggi Chowk, Ajmer. 3. Kamal Boolani Son Of Late Shri Megharam Boolani, Resident Of H.no. 735/55, Chanakyapuri Colony, Vaishali Nagar, Ajmer. 4. Yudhishtir Boolani Son Of Late Shri Jhamatmal Aayaldas Boolani, Resident Of H.No. 735/55, Chanakyapuri Colony, Vaishali Nagar, Ajmer. [2025:RJ-JP:3308] (2 of 3) [CW-14568/2021] 5. Smt. Riya Boolani Wife Of Shri Kamal Boolani, Resident Of H.no. 735/55, Chanakyapuri Colony, Vaishali Nagar, Ajmer. ----Petitioners Versus 1. Shri Rakesh Bhargava Son Of Late Shri Maheshchand Bhargava, Resident Of Phool Niwas, Mahatma Gandhi Marg, Kachahari Road, Ajmer. 2. Shri Rajeev Bhargava Son Of Late Shri Maheshchand Bhargava, Resident Of Phool Niwas, Mahatma Gandhi Marg, Kachahari Road, Ajmer. 3. Smt. Jyoti Bhargava Wife Of Late Shri Maheshchand Bhargava, Resident Of Phool Niwas, Mahatma Gandhi Marg, Kachahari Road, Ajmer. 4. Smt. Santosh Bhargava Wife Of Late Shri Sudhir Bhargava, Resident Of Mukund Garden, Adarsh Nagar, Ajmer. 5. Shri Sanjay Bhargava Son Of Late Shri Sudhir Bhargava, Resident Of Mukund Garden, Adarsh Nagar, Ajmer. 6. Smt. Veena Bhargava Wife Of Late Shri Nirmal Kumar Bhargava, Resident Of Mukund Garden, Adarsh Nagar, Ajmer. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None. For Respondent(s) : Mr.Aditya Choudhary, Adv. for Ms.Sunita Pareek, Adv. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN Order 23/01/2025 1. These two writ petitions are filed by landlord and tenant aggrieved of the orders passed by the Rent Tribunal and Rent Appellate Tribunal. In S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.14568/2021 respondent-M/s B.P. Enterprises has produced the copy of compromise entered into between the parties before the executing court. 2. The contention is that the writ petition be disposed of in view of compromise arrived at between the parties. [2025:RJ-JP:3308] (3 of 3) [CW-14568/2021] 3. On 06.01.2025 and 23.11.2023 the petitioners in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.14568/2021 (hereinafter ‘the petitioners’) were unrepresented. On 20.01.2025 similar was the position when learned counsel for the respondent-M/s.B.P. Enterprises contended that possession of the demised premises was handed over as the matter has been compromised. 4. Today also no one has put his appearance on behalf of the petitioners. 5. These writ petitions are disposed of in view of compromise arrived at between the parties and the terms and conditions are made part of this order. 6. The petitioners shall be at liberty to file an application for revival of these petitions in case cause of action still survives. 7. All pending misc. applications in both the writ petitions stand disposed of. (AVNEESH JHINGAN), J Himanshu Soni/231-232