SADRUL ANSARI ALIAS SADARUL ANSARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./52/2025 · 2025-01-17
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 30470 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 30470 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 52 of 2025
------
1. Sadrul Ansari @ Sadarul Ansari, Aged about 52 years, Son of Ali Hussain @ Ali Hussain Miya,
2. Md. Mehboob Alam @ Mahbub Aalam, Aged about 23 years, Son of Sadrual Ansari @ Sadrul Ansari Both resident of Village –Lahiya, Bhandra, P.O. – Narayanpur, P.S. –Penk Narayanpur, District –Bokaro (PIN-829107) … Petitioners
Versus State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party
------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioners : Mr. Aditya Banerjee, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Azeemuddin, Addl. P.P. ------
Order No.02 Dated- 17.01.2025
Heard the parties. Apprehending their arrest, the petitioners have moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with Penk Narayanpur P.S. Case No.32 of 2024 registered under sections 190/191/74/115/117/109 of the B.N.S., 2023. The Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners along with the co-accused persons were the members of an unlawful assembly and in prosecution of common object of the assembly outraged the modesty of the informant and attempted to murder her by assaulting her with iron rod. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioners are all false and the injury sustained by the victim is simple in nature. It is then submitted that the petitioners have no intention to kill anybody. It is then submitted that the petitioners undertake to furnish sufficient security including cash security and also undertake to cooperate with the investigation of the case and further undertake that they will not annoy or disturb the informant or her family members in any manner during the pendency of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioners be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am of the opinion that it is a fit case where the abovenamed petitioners be given the privilege of anticipatory bail.
Hence, in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from the date of this order, they shall be released on bail on depositing cash security of Rs.20,000/- each and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bermo at Tenughat, in connection with Penk Narayanpur P.S. Case No.32 of 2024 with the condition that the petitioners will cooperate with the investigation of the case and appear before the Investigating Officer as and when noticed by him and will furnish their mobile number and a copy of their Aadhar Card in the court below with the undertaking that they will not change their mobile number during the pendency of the case with further condition that that they will not annoy or disturb the informant or her family members in any manner during the pendency of the case subject to the conditions laid down under section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.)
Sonu/Gunjan-