IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr. MMO No. 969 of 2025 Date of Decision : 30.10.2025 Ashwani Gupta ....Petitioner Versus Neeraj Chandel ....Respondent Coram Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 No. For the petitioner : Mr. Dinesh Bhanot, Advocate. For the respondent : None. Rakesh Kainthla, Judge (Oral) The present petition has been #led for modi#cation of the order passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge-II, Kangra at Dharamshala. It appears from the record that petitioner had not approached the concerned Court and therefore there is no reason to entertain the present petition same at this stage. Learned counsel for the petitioner, under instructions, submits that he wants to withdraw the present petition with liberty to approach the concerned Court to explain the di/culty being faced by him. Ordered accordingly. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. (Rakesh Kainthla) Judge 30th October, 2025 (Chander) 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.