Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 30466 (RAJ)

VIMLESH SHARMA D/O SHRI SHIV RAM SHARMA W/O SHRI BRIJAN LAL SHARMA v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/15839/2023 · 2025-09-04

Anand Sharma

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:35696] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15839/2023 Vimlesh Sharma D/o Shri Shiv Ram Sharma W/o Shri Brijan Lal Sharma, aged about 60 years, R/o Near Sewar Thana, NH-11, Ward No. 4, Sewar, District Bharatpur (Raj.). ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Rajasthan, through Its Principal Secretary, Department of Elementary Education, Govt. of Rajasthan, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Finance, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.). 3. The Director, Directorate of Pension and Pensioners Welfare, Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur (Raj.). ----Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Sureyash Dhariwal Advocate, Ms. Pragya Seth Advocate, Mr. Kamlesh Sharma Advocate. For Respondents : Mr. Gopal Krishna Sharma Additional Government Counsel. Mr. Shubham Gupta Advocate on behalf of Mr. Rahul Lodha Advocate. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 04/09/2025 1. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the issue with regard to grant of annual grade increment to all such employees, who retire on 30th June every year, has already been put to rest by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide judgment dated 21.07.2023 in the case of Vijay Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan & Others (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 21/2020 and other connected writ petitions) and judgment dated [2025:RJ-JP:35696] (2 of 2) [CW-15839/2023] 15.07.2024 passed in the case of Ramesh Chandra Sharma Vs. The State of Rajasthan & Others (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10939/2024 & other connected writ petitions). 2. Learned Additional Government Counsel appearing for the respondents submit that in compliance of aforesaid decisions, the State Government has issued Order No. F.15(1)FD/Rules/2017/Pt.II dated 13.12.2024 for extending similar benefits to all the concerned employees. 3. In view of above, no cause of action for filing writ petition survives and the writ petition filed by the petitioner is dismissed as having become infructuous. 4. Pending application, if any, also stands dismissed. (ANAND SHARMA),J MANOJ NARWANI /54