- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:11564-DB CCC No. 791 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR N. V. ANJARIA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN CCC NO. 791 OF 2024 (CIVIL) BETWEEN: 1. MURALIDHAR K.T. S/O THIMMEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS R/AT No.3181 OLD KIKKERI ROAD K.R. PETE TOWN - 571 426 MANDYA DISTRICT. …COMPLAINANT (BY SRI V. SRINIVAS, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. DR. KUMAR THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER MANDYA DISTRICT MANDYA - 571 401. 2. SRI NANDEESH THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER PANDAVAPURA SUB-DIVISION Digitally signed by CHAITHRA Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:11564-DB CCC No. 791 of 2024 PANDAVAPURA MANDYA DISTRICT - 571 426. 3. SRI RAJU THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT K.R.PET - 571 426. 4. SRI RAJU KALLAPPAVATAR THE CHIEF OFFICER, TOWN MUNICIPALITY K.R.PETE - 571 426 MANDYA DISTRICT. …ACCUSED 5. STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS SECRETARY TO PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT M.S. BUILDING BENGALURU - 560 001 …PRO FORMA RESPONDENT (BY SRI NAVEEN CHANDRASHEKAR, AGA) THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT PRAYING TO INITIATE CONTEMPT PROCEEDING AGAINST THE ACCUSED NO.1 TO 4 FOR SHOWING WILL-FUL DISRESPECT AND DISOBEDIENCE TO THE ORDER DATED 06.03.2023 PASSED IN W.P.NO.1463/2023 VIDE ANNEXURE - A TO THIS PETITION. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:11564-DB CCC No. 791 of 2024 CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE N. V. ANJARIA and HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE N. V. ANJARIA) When the contempt petition came up for consideration today, learned Additional Government Advocate produced on record communication dated 17.03.2025 addressed by the Special Land Acquisition Officer to the office of learned Advocate General which is in vernacular, which was however explained to the court, in which it is stated that the amount of Rs.44,85,125/- is already processed to be credited in the account of the complainant which is towards the compensation as directed by learned Single Judge. The actual credit is a matter of time, it was stated. 2. The aforesaid communication itself is an evidence that the amount is credited and the order of learned Single Judge is complied with. 3. The aforesaid aspect could not be disputed by learned advocate Mr. V. Srinivas for the complainant who appeared through video conferencing. - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC:11564-DB CCC No. 791 of 2024 4. In light of the above, nothing survives in the present contempt petition. 5. The petition is disposed of accordingly. In view of disposal of the petition, the interlocutory application would not survive and it stands accordingly disposed of. Sd/- (N. V. ANJARIA) CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- (M.I.ARUN) JUDGE CR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 119