Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 30464 (ALL)

VINEET AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P.

BAIL/9481/2025 · 2025-03-20

Deepak Verma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:41684 Court No. - 67 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9481 of 2025 Applicant :- Vineet And 2 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Surendra Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicants Vineet, Bhupendra & Naihna with a prayer to release them on bail in Case Crime No.49 of 2025, under Sections 310(2), 317(3) B.N.S., 2023, P.S. Chhata, District Mathura during pendency of the trial. 3. It is argued by the learned counsel for the applicants that the applicants are innocent and have been falsely implicated in the present case. Applicants were arrested on 30.01.2025 by the police party, thereafter implicated in the present case without identification. Applicants have no concern with the alleged incident. No article has been recovered from the possession of the applicants to implicate them in the present case. Learned counsel for the applicants next submitted that co-accused Hemant has been granted bail by the coordinate Bench of this Court by order dated 06.03.2025. Learned counsel for the applicant next submits that the applicant having better case for getting bail on account of parity. There is no prospect of trial of the present case being concluded in near future due to heavy dockets. The applicant is not a previous convict. The applicants are languishing in jail since 30.01.2025 and in case they are enlarged on bail they will not misuse the liberty of bail. 4. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail prayer of the applicant but could not dispute the parity claimed by the applicants with co- accused. 5. Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the nature of offence, evidence, complicity of accused and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant, Vineet, Bhupendra & Naihna, who are involved in the aforesaid case crime, be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further, before issuing the release order, the sureties be verified. i. The applicants shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/ pressurizing the witnesses, during the investigation or trial. ii. The applicants shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment. iii. The applicants shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail. 7. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. Order Date :- 21.3.2025 SKD Digitally signed by :- SURJIT KUMAR DEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad