Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3046 (RAJ)

BHARAT LAL GURJAR S/O SHRI GHASILAL GURJAR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/427/2025 · 2025-02-18

Anil Kumar Upman

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:7184] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 427/2025 Bharat Lal Gurjar S/o Shri Ghasilal Gurjar, Aged About 49 Years, R/o Village Dhamun Kalan, Police Station Kotwali, Sawai Madhopur, Then Assistant Sub Inspector, In Charge Police Choki Kushtala, Police Station Rawanjana Dungar, District Sawai Madhopur (Rajasthan) (Presently Confined In Central Jail, Bharatpur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anshuman Saxena For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, GA-AAG with Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 18/02/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.309/2024 registered at Police Station C.P.S. Jaipur, ACB District for the offences under Section 7 of Prevention of Corruption Act and Section 61(2) of BNS. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel submits that fake recovery of bribe amount of Rs.10,000/- has been shown from the petitioner. It is submitted that petitioner is in custody since 25.12.2024. Further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. Trial will take time in its conclusion. [2025:RJ-JP:7184] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-427/2025] 3. Learned Public Prosecutor oppose the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, as also considering the material available on record in the form of case diary; period of custody, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner - Bharat Lal Gurjar S/o Shri Ghasilal Gurjar, shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J CHARU SONI /116