[2025:RJ-JP:3870] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11535/2024 Jagdeep Singh @ Jaggu Bhagwanpuriya S/o Swinder Singh, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Bhagwanpur, Tehsil Dera Baba Nanak, Police Station Kotli Surat Malhi, District Gurdaspur, Punjab. (At Present Confined In District Jail Dausa, District Dausa). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Anushree Sharma For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP Mr. Rishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 28/01/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.127/2024 registered at Police Station Mehandipur Balaji, District Dausa (Raj.) for the offence punishable under Section 3/25 of Arms Act. Later on, police filed charge- sheet in the matter for the offences punishable under Section 120B of IPC and Sections 9, 25(6) & 25(2) of Arms Act. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel submits that no recovery has been made from the possession of the petitioner. Counsel submits that person who was found in possession of the arms has been granted bail by learned trial Court vide order dated 20.07.2024. Petitioner is in custody [2025:RJ-JP:3870] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-11535/2024] since 24.07.2024 and trial will take time in its conclusion. Further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruit purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by the counsel for the petitioner. She submits that petitioner is habitual offender and 81 other cases in the different States have been registered against him. She further submits that petitioner is the person who supplied the arms to the different persons. 4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties and considering the material available on record, especially the fact that 81 other cases in different part of the country has been registered against the petitioner; gravity of the offence, I do not find it a fit case to allow this bail application. 5. Accordingly, this bail application stands dismissed. 6. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner prays that learned trial Court may be directed to to decide this case at earliest. 7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, learned trial Court is requested to expedite the trial and make all endeavour to conclude the trial on or before 31.07.2025. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /67