IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.17978 of 2025 Decided on: 20th November, 2025 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Viranjana Chauhan and others …..Petitioners Versus State of H.P. and others .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioners: Mr. Vinod Chauhan, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, Additional Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice. Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, learned Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is heard at this stage. 3. Petitioners seek applicability of Mohan Singh and Ors. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors.2 in order to claim regularization from the date of their initial appointment on contract basis. It is, however, seen from the 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 CWP No.814 of 2020, decided alongwith connected matters on 27.10.2025 2 record that the petitioners have not preferred any representation for the redressal of their grievances raised in the writ petition. 4. Confronted with above, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners would be preferring a representation within two weeks from today. In case such a representation is so made, the same shall be decided by the competent authority in accordance with law as well as taking into consideration the above judgment within a period of six weeks thereafter. The order so passed shall also be communicated to the petitioners. The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. Jyotsna Rewal Dua November 20, 2025 Judge Mukesh