- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:2987 WP No. 46699 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 46699 OF 2017 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: SRI KODANDA RAMU S/O MELUGIRI, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, R/O DHARMARAJ WORKSHIP ROAD, J.C.EXTENSION, KANAKAPURA, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT-562 117. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. NARAYAN MAYYAR., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. S.R.HEGDE HUDLAMANE., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. COMMISSIONER/DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE, ANANDA RAO CIRCLE, BANGALORE-01. 2. ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER, AND CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER, GENERAL HOSPITAL, KANAKAPURA, KANAKAPURA TALUK, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT-562 117. 3. D.RAJU S/O CHELUVEGOWDA, R/O AVR ROAD, (S.KARIYAPPA ROAD), KANAKAPURA TOWN AND TALUK, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT-562 117. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MANJUNATHA RAYAPPA., AGA FOR R1 & 2; SRI. H.N.BASAVARAJU., ADVOCATE FOR R3) Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:2987 WP No. 46699 of 2017 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri.Narayan Mayyar., counsel on behalf of Sri.S.R.Hegde Hudlamane., for the petitioner, Sri.Manjunatha Rayappa., AGA for respondents 1 & 2 and Sri.H.N.Basavaraju., counsel for respondent No.3 have appeared in person. 2. The notice dated:04.10.2017 vide Annexure-H is called into question in this Writ Petition on several grounds as setout in the Memorandum of Writ Petition. 3. Counsel for the respective parties urged several contentions. Heard the arguments and perused the Writ papers with care. 4. It is stated that an open space was allotted to the petitioner to run the Nandini Milk Booth in General Hospital, Kanakapura. A Notice was issued on 04.01.2017 stating that a tender was required to be called every five years, hence it was - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:2987 WP No. 46699 of 2017 ordered that the petitioner must vacate the open space that was allotted to him for running of Nandini Milk Booth. The petitioner has grievance about the issuance of the notice. In my view, such a notice cannot be called into question in the Writ Petition. If at all the petitioner has any grievance, he can as well suitably reply to the same. I decline to exercise power under the Writ jurisdiction. 5. Resultantly, the Writ Petition is dismissed. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 2 Sl No.: 12