IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.181 of 2025 Date of Decision: 05.12.2025 _______________________________________________________ Madan Lal …….Petitioners Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. … Respondents _______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner: Ms. Dhanvanti, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Rajan Kahol, Additional Advocate General with Mr. Ravi Chauhan & Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General. _______________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): Having carefully perused communication dated 07.11.2025, issued under the signatures of Additional Director (RD), Himachal Pradesh, Shimla, this Court finds that mandate contained in the judgment, sought to be executed, stands complied with. Pursuant to directions contained in the judgment, sought to be executed, services of the petitioner were regularized from due date. 2. Issue with regard to release of consequential benefits in terms of judgment, alleged to have been violated, is stated to be laid challenge by way of separate writ petition, which is pending adjudication. 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 3. In view of the above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant petition and accordingly, the same is disposed of. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge December 05, 2025 (sunil)