[2025:RJ-JP:38799] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 5912/2025 1. Tanveer Choudhary S/o Saleem Ji Choudhary, Aged About 38 Years, Resident Of C-5 Meer Ji Ka Bagh, Mla Quarters, Jaipur. 302001 Mobile No. 8107101487 2. Anindo Anhinto Banerji S/o A.j. Banerji, Resident Of 3302, Wing C, Cts No. 1070/01 To 06, Elanza, Off Link Road Malad West, Mumbai 400064 Mobile No. 9727726464 ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through PP 2. Police Commissioner Jaipur, Police Commissioner Office Police. 3. SHO, P.S. Jalupura Jaipur 4. SSP Crime Branch (Eow), Jammu J And K Through SHO PS Jalupura Jaipur ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Akshay Parekh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 20/09/2025 1. Petitioners have invoked inherent and extra ordinary jurisdiction of High Court under Section 528 of BNSS, by means of filing instant criminal misc. petition, for seeking transit anticipatory bail in connection with FIR No. 23/2025, registered at Police Station SSP Crime Branch (EOW) Jammu, J & K for offences under Sections 420 and 120-B of IPC. Copy of FIR has not been enclosed with the petition. 2. Counsel for the petitioners states that the instant petition came to be filed in the back drop of facts where on the basis of an Interstate Wireless Message dated 03.09.2025, allegedly sent from SSP Crime Branch (EOW) Jammu, J & K to SHO PS Jalupura, Jaipur, stating inter alia that two persons viz the present petitioners are [2025:RJ-JP:38799] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-5912/2025] involved in offence of cheating for an amount of approximately Rs.1.70 crores and recording which the FIR No.23/2025 under Sections 420 and 120-B of IPC has been registered, hence, for the purpose of investigation, their presence be arranged. On apprehension of arrest by the police in connection with above FIR, petitioners have rushed to the High Court seeking transit anticipatory bail. 3. During course of arguments, counsel for the petitioners admits that petitioners have already filed an application under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023 before the Sessions Judge, which came to be registered as transit anticipatory bail application No.268/2025 and has been dismissed by the Court of Additional Sessions Judge No.7, Jaipur Metropolitan-II vide order dated 11.09.2025. During course of hearing, the copy of order dated 11.09.2025 has been shown to the Court which has been taken on record. 4. Counsel for the petitioners, having argued the petition, admits that petitioners may be granted liberty to avail the appropriate remedy in law under Section 482 of BNSS against the order dated 11.09.2025 and with such liberty, seeks permission to withdraw the instant petition. 5. Without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the matter, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. 6. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (SUDESH BANSAL),J Pcg/170