BHAGWAN SAHAY SON OF SHRI RAMKARAN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/14332/2025 · 2025-09-19
Anoop Kumar Dhand
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 30451 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 30451 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14332/2025 Bhagwan Sahay Son of Shri Ramkaran, Aged About 57 Years, Resident Of Village Muhana, Tehsil Sanganer, District Jaipur (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus
1. State of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Revenue Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.)
2. District Collector Jaipur, District Jaipur (Raj.)
3. Tehsildar, Tehsil Sanganer, District Jaipur (Raj.)
4. Mandir Shri Mahadev Ji, Through Pujari Gopal Lal Sharma Son of Shri Bhori Lal Sharma Aged About 76 Years, Resident Of House No. 2165/66, Raja Shivdas Ji Ka Rasta, Gangauri Bazar, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Karanpal Singh For Respondent(s) :
JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 19/09/2025
1. The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:- In view of the above facts and grounds, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction to the Respondent No. 4 not to interfere in the lawful possession of the petitioner over the land bearing Khasra No. 77 (0.88 Hect.), Khasra No. 79 (0.60 Hect.), Khasra No. 80 (0.53 Hect.), total Rakba 2.01 Hectares situated at Village Muhana, Patwar Halka Muhana, Tehsil Sanganer, District Jaipur and further respondents may kindly be directed to not dispossess the petitioner and his family
(2 of 2) [CW-14332/2025] members from the land in question and the petitioner should not be deprived of temple cleaning and worship services in the larger interest of justice. ii. Hon'ble Court may deem fit, just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may also be passed in favour of the petitioner; iii. Cost of writ petition may kindly by awarded in favour of petitioner. 2. By way of filing this writ petition, the petitioner is seeking direction against the respondent No.4 not to interfere in the lawful possession on the subject land. 3. In the considered opinion of this Court, the relief sought as above, cannot be granted by this Court in exercise of its power contained under Article 226 of the Constitution of India as the disputed facts are involved in this petition which can be adjudicated by the Competent Court/Revenue Court. The petitioner would be at liberty to avail the appropriate remedies available to him under the law. 4. With the aforesaid observations, the present writ petition stands disposed of.
Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Ashu/23