- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19974 RFA No. 2006 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 2006 OF 2019 (DEC/INJ) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. K.M.REKHA D/O. LATE MUDDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/AT 7TH MAIN ROAD, MEENAKSHINAGAR, KAMAKSHIPALYA NEW EXTENSION, BANGALORE-560 079. 2. SMT. K.M.SUDHAMANI D/O. LATE MUDDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/AT 7TH MAIN ROAD, MEENAKSHINAGAR, KAMAKSHIPALYA NEW EXTENSION, BANGALORE-560 079. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. SHREEDHARA.B.E. & SRI. N.BYREGOWDA., ADVOCATES [ABSENT]) AND: 1. SMT. BHAGYALAKSHMAMMA W/O. LATE K.RAMAKRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, 2. SRI K.R.SANJEEV S/O. LATE K.RAMAKRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, 3. SRI K.R.JAGADISH S/O. LATE K.RAMAKRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19974 RFA No. 2006 of 2019 4. SMT. ERAMMA W/O. LATE T. KEMPAIAH, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, R/AT KAMAKSHIPALYA NEW EXTENSION, MAGADI ROAD, H.B.COLONY, BANGALORE. 5. SMT. SUNANDA @ SUNDARAMMA D/O. LATE T.KEMPAIAH, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/AT KAMAKSHIPALYA NEW EXTENSION, MAGADI ROAD, H.B.COLONY, BANGALORE-560 079. 6. SMT. LAKSHMAAMMA W/O. LATE K.M.MUDDAIH, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, R/AT 7TH MAIN ROAD, MEENAKSHINAGAR, KAMAKSHIPALYA NEW EXTENSION, BANGALORE-560 079. 7. SRI. SURESH S/O. LATE K.M.MUDDAIH, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/AT 7TH MAIN ROAD, MEENAKSHINAGAR, KAMAKSHIPALYA NEW EXTENSION, BANGALORE-560 079. …RESPONDENTS THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 READ WITH ORDER 41 RULE OF THE CPC, 1908. THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19974 RFA No. 2006 of 2019 ORAL ORDER When the case is called, the appellants are not represented. When the case is listed and is called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. The appeal is listed today for orders regarding non- compliance of office objections. As could be seen from the appeal papers, the objections raised at the scrutiny stage are not yet complied with. The appeal is filed in the year 2019. Now we are in the month of June, 2025. It's been six years, the office objections are not complied with. Despite the grant of time, the office objections are not complied with. It appears that the appellants are not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the Regular First Appeal is dismissed for non compliance of office objections. Because of dismissal of the appeal, interim order if any stands discharged and pending interlocutory applications if any are disposed of. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 32