Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 30447 (RAJ)

DR. DEVI SINGH GURJAR S/O SH. JAWAN SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/14212/2025 · 2025-09-18

Sanjeet Purohit, Sanjeev Prakash Sharma

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:38158-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14212/2025 Dr. Devi Singh Gurjar S/o Sh. Jawan Singh, Aged About 59 Years, R/o Vill. Nyotha, Teh. Nadbai, Distt. Bharatpur, Rajasthan- 321604. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan, Through Additional Chief Secretary, Finance Department, Government of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Director, Department of Ayurved, Government of Rajasthan, Ajmer, Rajasthan. 3. State of Rajasthan, Through Principle Secretary, Department of Ayurved And Bhartiya Chikitsa, Government of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 4. The Director Pension Department, Rajasthan Government, Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bhuvnesh Tiwari For Respondent Nos.1 and 4 Respondent Nos.2 and 3 : : Mr. Kuldeep Singh Rathore Mr. Vishnu Dutt Sharma and Ms. Sunita Meena, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEET PUROHIT Order 18/09/2025 1. Issue notice. 2. Mr. Kuldeep Singh Rathore, learned counsel, associate of Ms. Mahi Yadav, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 and 4. [2025:RJ-JP:38158-DB] (2 of 2) [CW-14212/2025] 3. Mr. Vishnu Dutt Sharma and Ms. Sunita Meena, learned counsels, associates of Mr. Bhuvnesh Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General, accept notice on behalf of respondents No.2 and 3. 4. Both the learned counsels are ad idem that in view of the judgment passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of State of Rajasthan & Ors. vs. Pyare Lal Meena & Ors. (Special Leave to Appeal (C) No.10560/2024), the issue raised in the present petition stands finally adjudicated, and the age of Ayush doctors has to be treated at par with Allopathic doctors and they would attain superannuation at the age of 62 years. 5. Since the petitioner is presently serving with the Department, he shall be allowed to continue in service till he attains the age of 62 years and would be paid regular salary. The retiral benefits will also accrue to him after he attains superannuation of 62 years. 6. In view of the above, the present Civil Writ Petition is, accordingly, allowed. 7. Pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of. (SANJEET PUROHIT),J (SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA),J AMIT/21