SMT. SURABHI BALHAL @ SURABHI DESHPANDEY v. HIMANSHU DESHPANDEY
CRR/846/2024 · 2025-08-13
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 30446 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 30446 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:41295
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRR No. 846 of 2024 Smt. Surabhi Balhal @ Surabhi Deshpandey W/o Himanshu Deshpandey, D/o Sudhakar Balhal, Aged About 20 Years R/o Near Ayyapa Temple, Sanyasi Para, Khamtarai, Raipur.
... Applicant versus Himanshu Deshpandey S/o Dinesh Kumar Deshpandey, Aged About 34 Years R/o Goutam Vila Mahavir Ward, In Front Of Axis Bank, Bhatapara, District-Balodabazar-Bhatapara (C.G.) Current Address- Janki Complex, Near Raja Tower, Ward No. 14, Chikali, District-Buldhana, Indian Overseas Bank Branch, Chikali (M.H.) 443201.
... Non-applicant For Applicant : None Hon'ble Shri
Ramesh Sinha,
Chief Justice
Order
on Board
14.08
.202
5 .
1. None appears nor any representation made on behalf of the applicants to press this revision on repeated calls.
2. The present revision petition has been filed by the applicant with the following prayer:-
“It is, therefore, prayed that this Hon'ble Court RAHUL DEWANGAN Digitally signed by RAHUL DEWANGAN
2 may kindly be pleased to allow this petition and enhance the monthly maintenance from Rs. 13,000/- to 25,000/- (Annexure P/1) passed by learned 1st Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Raipur (C.G.) in a M.С.С. Surabhi No.253/2022, in the case titled "Smt. Surabhi Balhal Deshpandey & Himanshu Deshpandey, in the interest of justice.”
3. It appears that with the passage of time, the applicant has lost interest in pursuing this matter.
4. Accordingly, the revision is dismissed on this ground alone. Interim relief if any stands vacated.
5. Let a copy of this order be transmitted to the trial Court concerned forthwith for necessary information and compliance.
Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha)
Chief Justice Rahul Dewangan