S.E.Rao v. The Assistant Provident Fund commissioner
WP/16353/2002 · 2025-01-21
Dhiraj Singh Thakur, Ravi Cheemalapati
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 30446 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 30446 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010440152002
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
WRIT PETITION NO: 16353 of 2002 Bench Sr.No:-2 [3483]
Sree Rayalaseema Paper Mills Limited, Represented by its Manager (Secretarial Services) Mr. S.E. Rao
...Petitioner Vs. The Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner and others ...Respondents ********** Advocate for Petitioner : NONE Advocate for Respondents : NONE
CORAM : THE CHIEF JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI DATE : 21st January, 2025 P C :
None for the petitioner.
Even on the previous date of hearing, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is no longer interested in pursuing the matter.
The Writ Petition is, accordingly, dismissed for non-prosecution. No
order as to costs.
Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, CJ
RAVI CHEEMALAPATI, J Vjl