RAKESH ROSHAN @ ROSHAN LAL S/O SHRI VIJAYPAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLW/1248/2025 · 2025-09-19
Avneesh Jhingan, Baljinder Singh Sandhu
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 30441 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 30441 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:38640-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 1248/2025
1. Rakesh Roshan @ Roshan Lal S/o Shri Vijaypal, Aged About 37 Years, R/o In Front Of C-60, Ranjeet Nagar, Alwar (Raj.) (Petitioner At Present Released On Permanent Parole).
2. Vijaypal S/o Shri Anoopram, Aged About 60 Years, R/o In Front Of C-60, Ranjeet Nagar, Alwar (Raj.) (Petitioner At Present Released On Permanent Parole).
3. Vinod Kumar S/o Shri Vijaypal, Aged About 35 Years, R/o In Front Of C-60, Ranjeet Nagar, Alwar (Raj.) (Petitioner At Present Released On Permanent Parole). ----Petitioners Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary Home, Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.).
2. The Director General Of Prison, Prisons Head Quarter, Ghat Gate, Jaipur, (Raj.).
3. The Advisory Committee Of Shortening Of Sentence, Through Its Chairman, Divisional Commissioner, Jaipur Division, Office At Mini Secretrate, Jaipur (Raj.).
4. The Advisory Committee Of Shortening Of Sentence, Through Its Member Secretary Superintendent Special Central Jail, Salyawas, Dausa (Raj.).
5. The Advisory Committee Of Shortening Of Sentence, Through Its Member Secretary Superintendent Central Jail, Alwar (Raj.). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tekchand Swami For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, Dy. G.A HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU Order 19/09/2025
[2025:RJ-JP:38640-DB] (2 of 2) [CRLW-1248/2025]
1. This petition is filed seeking directions to the respondents to expeditiously decide the application for shortening the sentence.
2. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner and perusing the pleadings, it is evident that the application for shortening the sentence was filed on 14.06.2025.
3. At this stage, no case is made out for interference in the writ jurisdiction.
4. The criminal writ petition (parole) is disposed of. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to pursue the application for shortening the sentence and make a request for an early disposal of the application.
5. In the eventuality of such request being made, the respondents shall consider the same in accordance with law.
(BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU),J (AVNEESH JHINGAN),J DIKSHA MISHRA /16