IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr. MMO No. 1332 of 2024 Date of Decision : 27.10.2025 Amritansh Shukla ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and another ....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 No For the petitioner : Mr. Shriyak Sharda, Advocate. For respondent No.1/State : Mr. Lokender Kutlehria, Additional Advocate General. For respondent No.2 : Ms. Sneha Kaushal, Advocate, vice Mr. Vikram Thakur, Advocate. Rakesh Kainthla, Judge (Oral) After arguing the matter for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he wants to withdraw the present petition. Hence, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. (Rakesh Kainthla) Judge 27th October, 2025 (Chander) 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.