[2025:RJ-JP:38789] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14461/2025 Sardar Singh Son Of Shri Man Singh, Aged About 33 Years, Resident Of Village And Post Sogar, Tehsil Kumher, District Bharatpur (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Gramin Vikas And Panchayatiraj Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.) 2. Secretary, Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Durgapura, Jaipur (Raj.) 3. Director, Elementary Education, Bikaner (Raj.). 4. District Education Officer, Elementary Education, Bharatpur (Raj.) 5. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad Bharatpur (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bajrang Sepat for Ms. Komal Kumari Giri For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA Order 20/09/2025 1. In the writ petition, the petitioner has raised various issues. However, the learned counsel for the petitioner, upon instructions from his client, submitted that he would be satisfied if: the petitioner is permitted to file a representation before the respondent No.2-The Secretary, Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Durgapura, Jaipur encapsulating the grievance(s) raised in the present writ petition; and if a direction may be issued to respondent No.2 to decide the same in a time-bound manner in [2025:RJ-JP:38789] (2 of 2) [CW-14461/2025] the light of the order passed by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the matter of Pankaj Kumar Sharma Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.1. 2. Heard and considered the submissions made at bar. 3. In view of the above, the present writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file a representation before respondent No.2 within a period of four (4) weeks from today. The respondent No.2 is directed to decide the said representation within a period of six (6) weeks from the date of filing of such representation by a speaking order, strictly in accordance with law. 4. It is made clear that the aforesaid direction to decide such representation has been issued only with a view to ensure an expeditious redressal of the petitioner’s grievance. The same shall not be construed to be an order to decide the representation in a particular manner. 5. Furthermore, it is needless to say that after adjudication of the representation, if any cause of action still survives, the petitioner would be at liberty to avail further remedies available under the law. 6. Other pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of, accordingly. (MANEESH SHARMA),J SOURAV /18 1. S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.16289/2023