APHC010439042017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 22757/2017 Between: 1. TOKURI BABURAO, S/O VEERA SWAMY, 53 YRS., R/O. KAMAVARAPU KOTA VILLAGA AND MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS SECRETARY, CO- OPERATIVE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DIST. 2. JOINT REGISTRAR OF COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES, -DISTRICT CO- OPERATIVE OFFICER, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ELURU. 3. DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ELURU. 4. THE LARGER SIZED COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES LTD, KAMAVARAPUKOTA VILLAGE AND MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ELURU. REP BY SECRETARY 5. THE LARGER SIZED COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES LTD, KAMAVARAPUKOTA VILLAGE AND MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ELURU. REP BY ITS MANAGING COMMITTEE-PERSON IN-CHARGE 6. A SATYANARAYANA, S/O. SUBBARAO, 40 YRS., R/O. K.JAGGAVARAM, T.NARSAPURAM MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI 2 DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 5th respondent in appointing the 6th respondent as secretary to the 4th respondent society ignoring the seniority of the petitioner by resolution No.27 dt.22-03-2017 as illegal, arbitrary, and violative of principles of natural justice and without authority, o consequently directing the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for appointment as secretary for the 4th respondent society and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2017(WPMP 28031 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for appointment as secretary for the 4th respondent society by suspending the resolution No.27 dt.22-03-2017 passed by the 5th respondent and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SIVA SANKARA RAO BORRA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. BOBBA VIJAYALAKSHMI 2. GP FOR COOPERATION (AP) 3 The Court Made the Following Order:- This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed for the following relief: “to issue writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 5th respondent in appointing the 6th respondent as secretary to the 4th respondent society ignoring the seniority of the petitioner by resolution No.27 dt.22-03-2017 as illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice and without authority, consequently directing the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for appointment as secretary for the 4th respondent society and pass...” 2. Sri Siva Sankar Borra, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in view of the subsequent events taken place in the lis, the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication and the Writ Petition has become infructuous. 3. Recording the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no orders as to costs. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. _____________________________ MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM, J Date: 29.08.2025 BSM 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO.22757 of 2017 29.08.2025 BSM