1 2025:CGHC:20962 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3600 of 2022 Anuj S/o Shri Ant Ram Aged About 25 Years R/o Village Bhaistara, Tahsil Akaltara, District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner versus 1 - Secretary, National Open Board Examination In India, Office At Noida, New Delhi. 2 - Secretary Chhattisgarh State Open Board Examination, Pension Bada, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Principal Government Higher Secondary School, Akaltara, District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Deepak Choubey, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Rajeev Kumar Dubey, Advocate For Respondent No.1 : Ms. Priyanka Rai, Advocate on behalf of Ms. Supriya Upasane, Advocate For Respondent No.2 : Mr. Pankaj Agrawal, Advocate Hon’ble Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad, Judge Order on Board 07.05.2025 1 Heard Mr. Deepak Choubey, learned counsel on behalf of Mr. Rajeev Kumar Dubey, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as YOGESH TIWARI Digitally signed by YOGESH TIWARI Date: 2025.05.08 11:47:46 +0530 2 Ms. Priyanka Rai, learned counsel on behalf of Ms. Supriya Upasane, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.1 and Mr. Pankaj Agrawal, learned counsel for respondent No.2. 2 The petitioner has filed the instant petition with the following relief(s):- “10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to substitute to the original name of father of petitioner as "Ant Ram" in place of "Sant Ram" in the said mark sheet of the petitioner. 10.2 That, That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to decide the application dated 11-03-2022 submitted by the petitioner. 10.3 Any other relief, which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper, may also be passed in favour of the petitioner together with cost of the petition.” 3 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that name of the father of the petitioner has wrongly been mentioned in his Class-XII mark-sheet as “Sant Ram”, whereas in all his testimonials, name of his father has been mentioned as “Ant Ram”, hence, a direction be issued to the respondent authorities to correct the same within some stipulated time. 3 4 Learned counsel for respondent No.1 submits that if the petitioner files an application before respondent No.1 along with requisite fees of Rs.650/-, it will consider the case of the petitioner. 5 Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner is directed to file appropriate application along with requisite fee of Rs.650/- by way of demand draft to the respondent No.1 within a period of 15 days. Thereafter, the respondent No.1 is directed to consider the case of the petitioner and to pass appropriate order considering the fact that in all testimonials of the petitioner, name of his father has been mentioned as “Ant Ram” except the mark-sheet of Class-XII. This be done within a period of 60 days from the date of filing of the application by the petitioner before respondent No.1. 6 With the aforesaid observation/direction, instant petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Yogesh