M/S CHOLAMANDALAM DBS FINANCE LIMITED v. SMT JAYAMMA
MFA/7795/2015 · 2025-04-03
Lalitha Kanneganti
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 30417 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 30417 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:14263 MFA No. 7795 of 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 7795 OF 2015 (MV-D) BETWEEN:
M/S. CHOLAMANDALAM DBS FINANCE LIMITED, PRESENTLY AS CHOLAMANDALAM FINANCE AND INVESTMENT LIMITED, HAVING ITS BRANCH OFFICE AT NO.45, PRESTIGE LIBRA, 2ND FLOOR, ABOVE PASSPORT OFFICE, LALBAGH ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 027.
REPRESENTED BY ITS OFFICER MR. RAVI T.J, S/O JARARAM T.L, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. CHANDRASHEKAR S.N, ADVOCATE (ABSENT))
AND:
1.
SMT. JAYAMMA, WIFE OF R. NARASHIMHA MURTHY, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, RESIDING AS LAKSHIPURA, DASANAPURA, BANGALORE - 560 023.
2.
SRI. L.R. NARASIMHA MURTHY,, SON OF LATE RANGAIAH, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, RESIDING AT LAKSHIPURA, DASANAPURA, BANGALORE - 560 023.
3.
SRI. T. KUMAR, THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, M/S T.S.M. CORGO MOVERS, NO.232, MANGAMMANAPALYA, BEGURU, BANGALORE - 560 008.
Digitally signed by MEGHA MOHAN Location:
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:14263 MFA No. 7795 of 2015
4.
THE ILS LOGISTIC PRIVATE LIMITED, REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR, BRANCH OFFICE AT FLAT NO.G-6, NAVEEN APARTMENTS, NO.10, 13TH MAIN ROAD, VASANTHNAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 052. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MAHADEVA SWAMY P, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2)
THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE
JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 14.07.2015 PASSED IN MVC NO.
571/2011 ON THE FILE OF MEMBER, MACT & XX ADDITIONAL SMALL CAUSES JUDGE, BANGALORE, AN AWARDING COMPENSATION OF RS. 6,10,000/- WITH INTEREST AT 8% PA. FROM THE DATE OF PETITION TILL REALISATION.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
ORAL JUDGMENT When this matter came up on 28.06.2024, there was no representation on behalf of the appellant. Again on 02.04.2025, as there was no representation on behalf of the appellant, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption 'dismissal'. Today also, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE KA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5 CT: BHK