Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 30416 (MAD)

Kurios Finvest Llp v. Reliance Creative And Content Solutions Llp

OA/176/2024 · 2025-02-26

Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

O.A.Nos.176, 177 & 178 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 26.02.2025 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY O.A.Nos.176, 177 & 178 of 2024 and A.Nos.1275 & 1276 of 2024 in C.S.(Comm.Div.)No.33 of 2024 In all the applications M/s.Kurios Finvest LLP, Rep.by its Designated Partner, Mrs.Renuka Kumar, No. 7, College Lane, Chennai - 600006. Email Id:kuriosfinvest@gmail.com .. Applicant & .. Plaintiff Vs. 1.M/s.Reliance Creative And Content Solutions LLP, Rep. by its Authorised Signatory, Mr.Pushpak Shah, 8th Floor, 803/804, Lotus Grandeur, Veera Desai Road, Andheri (West), Mumbai - 400 053 Email Id:pushpak.shah@relianceada.com and seven others. .. Respondents & Defendants Prayer in O.A.No.176 of 2024: Judges Summon under Order XIV Rule 8 of O.S.Rules read with Order XXXIX Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, to grant an ad-interim injunction restraining the 1st to 8th respondents, their agents, servants, or anybody claiming through or under them from making any 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis O.A.Nos.176, 177 & 178 of 2024 future alienations of the rights or creating encumbrances in the films viz., Singham Again, Aap Ki Pados Mein, Section 84 and Chamkila? For Applicant/Plaintiff: Mr.Anirudh Krishnan For Respondent(s)/Defendant(s): M/s.Karthik Sundaram for R1 & R2 Mr.Avinash Wadhwani for R3 M/s.M.V.Swaroop for R6 M/s.S.Aswini for R5 Mr.Satish Parasaran, Senior Advocate, For Mr.Rahul Unnikrishnan, T.Gayathri for R7. O R D E R These applications inter alia pertain to four movies. Out of these movies, only two movies were released. 2.With regard to the revenue from the movie “Singham Again”, the seventh respondent has filed an affidavit without prejudice to the contention that the application is not maintainable. The gross and net revenue from the exploitation of the movie have been set out in paragraph No.7 of the affidavit. Since the disclosed net revenue is negative, these applications are infructuous. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis O.A.Nos.176, 177 & 178 of 2024 3.By recording the same, these applications are dismissed as infructuous without any order as to costs. This is without prejudice to the plaintiff's right to re-apply if other movies dealt with in these applications are slated for release or released subsequently. The contention of the third and seventh respondents that these applications are not maintainable is kept open for adjudication, if required. 26.02.2025 (3/3) sli 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis O.A.Nos.176, 177 & 178 of 2024 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY,J. sli O.A.Nos.176, 177 & 178 of 2024 and A.Nos.1275 & 1276 of 2024 in C.S.(Comm.Div.)No.33 of 2024 26.02.2025 (3/3) 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis