S. Lakshamaiah Naidu, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/28660/2017 · 2025-07-31
Maheswara Rao Kuncheam
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 30416 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 30416 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010439282017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] FRIDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 28660/2017 Between:
1. S. LAKSHAMAIAH NAIDU,, S/0. NARASAIAH NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS. OCCUPATION:FIELD INSPECTOR. ANDHRA PRAGATHI FARMERS SERVICE COOP. SOCIETY LTD., THIMMASAMUDRAM, T.SUNDUPALLE MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT.R/O. D.NO.21749, T.SUNDUPALLI, KADAPA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, AGRICULTURE AND COOPERATION (COOP-II1) DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT. VELAGAPUDI, ANDHRA PRADESH
2. THE KADAPA DISTRICT COOPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LTD, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, R.S.ROAD, KADAPA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT.
3. ANDHRA PRAGATHI FARMERS SERVICE COOP SOCIETY LTD, , REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, THIMMASAMUDRAM.
T.SUNDUPALLE MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. PALEM LAKSHMI PRIYA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR COOPERATION (AP)
2. S DUSHYANTH REDDY
3. CHALLA SIVASANKAR
The Court made the following ORDER: On 25.07.2025, there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal’.
2. It is represented by the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Cooperation that the petitioner was retired from service on 31.05.2019 and also received all the retiral benefits from the concerned department.
3. Learned Standing Counsel for respondent No.3 is also present.
4. Today also, despite the matter being listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, none appeared for the petitioner. From this, it appears that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the matter.
5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 01.08.2025 Ivd
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM
WRIT PETITION No.28660 of 2017
Date: 01.08.2025
Ivd