APHC010439152025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF AUGU^ TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No: 22437 OF 2025 o \o Between: Sri Pebbili Ravi Kumar, S/o. Pebbili Ram Mohan Rao, Aged 50 years, Occ: Business, D.No.18-175, Prahaladapuram, Simhachalam, Visakhapatnam. ...PETITIONER AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Principal Secretary (Home), Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi. 2. The Commissioner of Police, Visakhapatnam City. 3. The Assistant Commissioner of Police East, Visakhapatnam City. 4. The Station House Officer, M.V.P., Police Station, Visakhapatnam City. 5. Allu Kalyani, W/o.Allu Ramu, Aged 36 years, R/at Kummaravedi, Kothapallii, Kotabommali, Srikakulam-532201 Presently Residing Madhuruvada. 6. Surapu Venkata Ramana Murthy, S/o. not known to the Petitioner, Aged 40 years, D.No. 1-357, Main Street Polaki Mandalam Susaram, Srikakulam District. 532430 presently Resident of Rama Srinagar area, Visakhapatnam. 7. Surapu Sreeramulu, S/o. Surapu Chinappadu, Aged 46 Susaram, Polaki Mandal, Abudhabi, United Arab Emirates. at Talkies, years , R/at Priyagraharam, Srikakulam 532430 R/at ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court pleased to Issue a Writ or Order or Direction may be more particularly one in the Nature of a WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the Particularly the 3^' and 4'*^ Respondents in not taking any action in connection with the Complaint given by the petitioner through M.L.C well as Complaint given before the 4*^ respondent about the 5*^ and 6**^ respondents with the active action of the respondents .. at K.G., Hospital as illegal acts of the support and advise of the 7*^ respondent along with rowdy elements attacked and kidnapped the petitioner and caused injuries, somehow petitioner K.G.Hospital, Visakhapatnam rescued and admitted into the as Inpatient and was discharged on 18*^ August, 2025 even though prima facie a Cognizable offence was made out, inspite of the same the respondents had not registered the F.I.R., against the ^ un-official respondents further official respondent as a Counter blast of principles of natural more taking a false complaint from the un case, all are ilelgal, unlawful , violation justice. Violation of Articles 14, 19, 21 of the Constitution of India, Consequently direct the Official respondents to register the F.I.R., basing on the Complaint given by the petitioner pending before respondents 3 & 4 as Judgment of Hon'ble Apex Court Lalitha Kumari's Case in view of endanger to the petitioners life. per the law by taking into consideration of the lA.No: 1 OF 907^ Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court direct the Official respondents to register the F.I.R., the petitioner pending before the respondents 3 & may be pleased to basing Complaint given by 4 as per the law by taking into consideration of the Judgment of Hon'ble Apex Court Lalitha Kumari's Case in view of endanger to the petitioner’s life. y Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI R.SIVA SAI SWARUP Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4: SRI V.FAROOQ, ASST.GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent Nos.5 to 7: The Court made the following order: i V APHC010439152025 r IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT the honourable dr justice VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 22437/2025 Between: SRI PEBBILI RAVI KUMAR, S/0 PEBBILI RAM MOHAN RAO, AGED 50 YRS , OCCBUSINESS, D.NO.18-175, SIMHACHALAM, VISAKHAPATNAM. PRAHALADAPURAM, ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (HOME), SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 2.THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, VISAKHAPATNAM CITY. 3.THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE EAST, VISAKHAPATNAM CITY. 4.THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, . M.V.P., POLICE STATION, VISAKHAPATNAM CITY. 5.ALLU KALYANI, W/0 ALLU RAMU, AGED 36 YRS R/AT KUMMARAVEDI, KOTHAPALLII ,KOTABOMMALI, SRIKAKULAM- 532201 PRESENTLY RESIDING AT MADHURUVADA 6.SURAPU VENKATA RAMANA MURTHY, S/0 NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED 40 YRS, D.NO. 1-357 , MAIN STREET POLAKI MANDALAM SUSARAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 532430 PRESENTLY RESIDENT OF RAMA TALKIES, SRINAGAR AREA, VISAKHAPATNAM. 7.SURAPU SREERAMULU, . S/0 SURAPU CHIINAPPADU AGED 46 YRS , R/AT SUSARAM, POLAKI MANDAL, PRIYAGRAHARAM, SRIKAKULAM 532430 R/AT ABUDHABI, UNITED ARAB EMIRATES. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.RSIVASAI SWARUP Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: V. ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for; dT.- Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents Particularly the 3rd and 4th Respondents in not taking any action in KCHnZT 9iven by the petitioner through mIc at ^hfZnZ t Sr/Ven before the 4th respondent about ZvZ nf jL ^ ''^^P^ndents with the active support and and ZZiTh injuries, some how petitioner rescued JkihJZH Visakhapatnam as Inpatient and was nfZZ^ ^ 2025 even though prime facie a Cognizable mnM Tfh same the respondents had not tlkinZZJ Z un-official respondents further more taking a false complaint from the un-official respondent as a Counter blast SUSP all areil^gal, unlawful, violation of principles of natural justice rTecTthZ(Zr"'1 Constitution of India, Consequently direct the Official respondents to register the F.i.R., basing on the Complaint given by the petitioner pending before respondents 3 4 as per the law by takmginto consideration of the Judgment of Hon’bie Apex Court Laiirna Kumari s Case in view of endanger to the petitioner’s life ” 2. Sri R.Siva Sai Swaroop, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that, inspite of the complaint given by the Petitioner through the MLC intimation, the Police have not registered the case. 3. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. Considering the submissions, the Writ Petition Home, would 4. is disposed of directing the Police to look into the issue, since the matter pertains to registration of case based on MLC intimation, and take according to governing rules and law. There shall be appropriate course of action no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. Sd/- N. NAGAMMA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1 The Principal Secretary (Home), State of Andhra Pradesh Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 2. The Commissioner of Police, Visakhapatnam City. 3. The Assistant Commissioner of Police East, Visakhapatnam City. 4. The Station House Officer, M.V.P., Police Station, Visakhapatnam City. 5. Allu Kalyani, W/o.Allu Ramu, Aged 36 years, R/at Kummaravedi, Kothapallii, Kotabommali, Srikakulam-532201 Presently Residing at Madhuruvada. / 6. Surapu Venkata Ramana Murthy, S/o.not known to.the Petitioner, Aged D.No.1-357, Main Street Polaki Mandalam Susaram, 40 years, Srikakulam District Srinagar area, Visakhapatnam. - 532430 presently Resident of Rama Talkies, 7. Surapu Sreeramulu, S/o.Surapu Chiinappadu, Aged 46 Susaram, Polaki Mandal, Priyagraharam, Srikakulam 532430 Abudhabi, United Arab Emirates. 8. One CC to Sri R.Siva Sai Swarup, Advocate [OPUC] 9. Two CCs to GP for Home, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 10. Two CD Copies. years, R/at R/at ssb - HIGH COURT DATED:28/08/2025 ORDER WP No.22437 OF 2025 DISPOSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS