[2025:RJ-JP:5369-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 887/2024 1. Rajesh Dhingra S/o Shri Hakam Rai Dhingra, Aged About 70 Years, House No. 1182, Purani Abadi, Near Kocher Hospital, Sri Ganganagar , Rajasthan 2. Papindra Singh S/o Shri Hakam Singh, Aged About 72 Years, R/o C/o Nosegay Public School, 7-E(Chhoti), Chak Brithliya, Sri Ganganagar, Rajasthan. 3. Rakesh Kumar Koorichh S/o Shri Trilok Chand, Aged About 74 Years, R/o A-38/a, Ashok Vihar, Phase02, Harihar Apartments, Delhi-52. 4. Mohan Lal Samaria S/o Shri Janki Lal, Aged About 77 Years, R/o 20-A, Alaknanda Colony, Near M.p.s. School, Vaishali Nagar, Ajmer, Rajasthan. 5. Bhoopendar Mohan Kanwar S/o Shri Mohan Lal Kanwar, Aged About 78 Years, R/o 6-B-8, Jawahar Nagar, Sri Ganganagar, Rajasthan. 6. Om Prakash Gupta S/o Shri Gharsi Ram, Aged About 75 Years, R/o 5-M-33, Jawahar Nagar, Sri Ganganagar, Rajasthan. 7. Ranjeet Singh S/o Shri Naginder Singh, Aged About 74 Years, R/o Ward No. 12, Purani Abadi, Uda Ram Chowk, Behind Ramdev Mandir, Sri Ganganagar, Rajasthan. 8. Kumbh Singh S/o Shri Lun Singh, Aged About 72 Years, R/o Village Gundusar, Tehsil Nokha, District Bikaner, Rajasthan. 9. Sohan Lal Singhmar (Since Deceased) S/o Shri Kalu Ram, Through Legal Representative, His Wife, Smt. Gomati Devi W/o Late Shri Sohan Lal Singhmar, Aged About 69 Years, R/o Village 7-E (Chhoti), Post 5-E (Chhhoti) District Sri Ganganagar, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus 1. Shri Subir Kumar, Secretary To The Govt., Department Of College Education, Secretariat, Jaipur 2. Shri Pukhraj Sain, Commissioner, College Education, Rajasthan, Shiksha Shankul, J.ln. Marg, Jaipur. 3. Shri Hariram Kukana, Secretary/manager, Managing Committee, Maharshi Dayanand Shiksha Samiti, Opposite Maharaja Ganga Singh Stadium, Sriganganagar. 4. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary To The Govt. Department Of College Education, Secretariat, Jaipur. ----Respondents [2025:RJ-JP:5369-DB] (2 of 3) [CCP-887/2024] For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ishwar Jain Mr. Bhaskar Yadav For Respondent(s) : Mr. Basant Singh Chhaba, AAG with Mr. Hardik Singh Mr. Ajay Raj Tantia HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Order 06/02/2025 1. The contempt petition has been filed alleging willful disobedience of an order passed by this Court on 06.11.2015. 2. The order passed by this Court was a judgment in rem. 3. The respondents shall consider the case of the petitioners. Instead of issuing notice on contempt, we are inclined to dispose of this petition with a direction that the case of the petitioners shall also be examined in terms of an order dated 01.12.2021 passed by this Court in the case of Shri Banwari Lal Bhukar & Anr. vs. Anoop Khinchi & Ors.-D.B. Civil Contempt Petition No.740/2016 and other connected matters wherein this Court had given detailed directions as below:- “1. It shall be an obligation on the part of the Commissioner, College Education to immediately release the dues payable to the petitioners as per the directions issued by this Court from time to time and the directions which have already been issued by the Hon’ble Supreme Court on 09.09.2021 in the case of State of Rajasthan Versus Manju Saxena & Ors., Special Leave to Appeal (c) No.13791/2019, wherein, the Hon’ble Supreme Court had directed compliance to be made within a period of eight weeks. 2. A brief, but clear order regarding compliance of the order in respect of each of the contempt petitioners will have to be passed by the concerned Directorate within a period of ten weeks from today. 3. The orders in respect of each of the contempt petitioners, which are required to be passed clearly stating [2025:RJ-JP:5369-DB] (3 of 3) [CCP-887/2024] compliance of the order, shall be reported directly to the Registry of this Court, which shall be placed before this Court under a separate registered case. 4. With the aforesaid observations and directions, this contempt petition, at this stage, is disposed off, however, with liberty to revive, if any grievance still remains unredressed.” 4. All the authorities including the Secretariat of the Department of College Education as also the private school education officials shall be under an obligation to provide necessary information, if any demanded by Commissionerate of College Education, towards compliance of the order which was passed earlier by this Court and in the case referred to hereinabove. (UMA SHANKER VYAS),J (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),CJ N.Gandhi/Gaurav/39