APHC010438892024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] SATURDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3955/2024 Between: 1. T A JYOTHESWARI, W/O. T.A. SIVA MOHAN REDDY, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.47/330-4, RAVINDRA NAGAR, KADAPA CITY, YSR DISTRICT 2. G. SARADA,, W/O. G. SIVAIAH, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.13/43 UPSTAIRS, B.K.M STREET, KADAPA CITY, YSR DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. S SATYANARAYANA IAS, The Commissioner of Endowments, AP Endowments Department, Gollapudi, Vijayawada. ...CONTEMNOR Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents in terms of Section 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for wilfully disobeying/violating the orders of this Honble Court passed in W.P.NO. 9931 OF 2024, dated 29-04-2024 passed by Honourable Sri Justice SUBBA REDDY SATTI and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with personal appearance for further hearings before this Hon’ble Court in CC.No.3955 of 2024 and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. DHARANI KUMAR B Counsel for the Contemnor: 1. VENKATA SAI KRISHNA PONNURU The Court made the following: :: ORDER :: The above contempt case has been filed complaining of violation of the order dated 29.04.2024 in W.P.No.9931 of 2024. 2. Heard Sri B. Dharani Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners, and Sri A. Vineeth, learned counsel representing Sri P. Venkata Sai Krishna, learned counsel for the respondent. 3. The writ petition filed by the petitioners was disposed of on 29.04.2024, directing the Commissioner of Endowments to pass appropriate orders, taking into consideration the report of the Assistant Commissioner of Endowments on the representation made by the petitioner regarding deletion of property of an extent of Ac.0.21 cents in Sy.No.95/2 of Cherlopalli Revenue Village, C.K. Dinne Mandal, Kadapa Revenue Division, YSR District, within three months. Thereafter, a speaking order was passed vide Proceedings No.M3/19024(35)/25/2022, dated 24.10.2024, by the respondent- Commissioner of Endowments. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the respondent- Commissioner of Endowments has passed the aforementioned order, without considering the report submitted by the Assistant Commissioner, Endowments, dated 07.11.2022. 5. Learned counsel for the respondent would submit that the respondent- Commissioner of Endowments has considered the report of the Assistant Commissioner, dated 07.11.2022 and passed the aforementioned speaking order. 6. A perusal of the proceedings dated 24.10.2024, the respondent- Commissioner of Endowments, has considered the report of the Assistant Commissioner dated 07.11.2022. If the petitioner is aggrieved by the proceedings dated 24.10.2024, the petitioner can challenge the same before the appropriate forum. 7. Given the facts and circumstances of the case, the Contempt Case is closed. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 30.08.2025 TVN 367 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE No.3955 OF 2024 Date: 30.08.2025 TVN