Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 30404 (ALL)

ARUN KUMAR LAL v. State of UP AND 5 OTHERS

WRIA/3220/2024 · 2025-09-08

Mayur Jain Jt Registrar J Listing

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 3220 of 2024 Court No. - 32 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. 1. The instant writ petition has been filed for the following reliefs:- "(i) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of Certiorari for quashing the impugned order dated 01.11.2023 (Annexure no.1 to this writ petition), as well as the charge sheet dated 27.01.2024 (Annexure no.2 to this writ petition) and also to quash the entire ongoing enquiry against the petitioner on the basis of direction issued by the impugned order dated 01.11.2023 by respondent no.5. (ii) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of Mandamus, directing the respondent no.3, 4 and 5 to pay the petitioner's full salary forthwith with the entire arrear of salary accrued upon the petitioner for the period from 01.11.2023 till the date of actual payment deducting the allowance, within the short stipulated period as may be fixed by this Hon'ble Court." 2. Mr. V.K. Singh, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. A.K. Pandey, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner fairly conceded that enquiry has already been concluded and enquiry report has been submitted to the competent authority for further action. 3. Mr. Vinay Khare, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Ms. Aarushi Khare, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no.4 has not contradicted the aforesaid facts as stated by learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner. 4. Taking into consideration the aforesaid submissions made by learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner, I do not find any ground to keep the matter pending. Since, the enquiry initiated against the petitioner has Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anil Kumar Pandey, Naresh Chandra Tripahti, Ramji Shukla, Suchita Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : Aarushi Khare, C.S.C., Ishan Khare, Rohit Pandey Arun Kumar Lal .....Petitioner(s) State Of Up And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) already been concluded and enquiry report has been submitted before the Competent Authority, the authority concerned is directed to pass appropriate and reasoned order on the enquiry report in accordance with law. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. 6. Petitioner will be at liberty to approach the competent authority regarding the payment of salary. September 9, 2025 Atul WRIA No. 3220 of 2024 2 (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ATUL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad