Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 30401 (CHH)

VIJAY VISHWAKARMA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/4824/2020 · 2025-05-06

Shri Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:20853 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 4824 of 2020 1. Vijay Vishwakarma, S/o Bansuprasad Vishwakarma, Aged About 57 Years, R/o Silma Sedam, Batoli, District Surguja, Chhattisgarh. 2. Gyan Bhushan Toppo, S/o Bhimsen Toppo, Aged About 49 Years, R/o Sargawan Majhlipara, Post Sakalo, Ambikapur, District Surguja, Chhattisgarh. 3. S.S. Hariwanshi, S/o Sahdev Ram, Aged About 60 Years, R/o Village Bilaspur, Batoli, District Surguja, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioners versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, School Education Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Capital Complex, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya Capital Complex, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3. Director, Public Instruction, Directorate, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 4. Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Raipur District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 5. Joint Director, Public Education Surguja Division Ambikapur, District Surguja, Chhattisgarh. 6. Divisional Joint Director, Public Education, Surguja Division Ambikapur, District Surguja, Chhattisgarh. 7. District Education Officer, Public Instruction, Surguja, Division Ambikapur, District Surguja, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents (Cause title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioners : Mr. Anurag Singh, Advocate. For State/Respondents : Mr. Amandeep Singh, P.L. DEEPTI JHA NIRALA Digitally signed by DEEPTI JHA NIRALA 2 Hon’ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi Order On Board 07/05/2025 1. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that respondents authorities have issued the Corrigendum (संशोधित पत्र) dated 19.10.2020, hence, the grievance of the petitioners have already been redressed, therefore, he seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the instant writ petition. 2. State counsel has no objection to allow the limited prayer of the petitioners. 3. Permission is granted. 4. Accordingly, instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge