SUPRAVA JENA v. ADDL.COMMNR.SETTLEMENT CONSOLIDATION ,BALASORE
CMAPL/191/2025 · 2026-01-19
Sashikanta Mishra
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3040 (ORI) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3040 (ORI) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CMAPL NO. 191 of 2025
Suprava Jena …. Petitioner
Represented by Mr. S.K. Nayak, Advocate
-Versus – Addl. Commissioner- Settlement Consolidation Balasore, and others …. Opp. Parties
Represented by ASC
CORAM:
JUSTICE SASHIKANTA MISHRA ORDER_ 19.01.2026
1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner files a memo in payment of cost of Rs.2,000/- to opposite party No.4.
3. Considering the submissions and the ground raised, the CMAPL is allowed.
4. The Writ Petition is restored to file.
(Sashikanta Mishra)
Judge
BC Tudu
Order No.
05.