- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:960 WP No. 144485 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 144485 OF 2020 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. UMA W/O. VEERAMAHESHWARAYYA UDASIMATH, AGE: 44 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD, R/O: VIJAYANAGAR, HALIYAL ROAD, DHARWAD-580023. 2. KUMARI. AISHWARAYA D/O. VEERAMAHESWARAYYA UDASIMATH, AGE: 22 YEARS, OCC: STUDENT, R/O: VIJAYANAGAR, HALIYAL ROAD, DAHRWAD-580023. 3. KUAMRI. RAJASHRI D/O. VEERAMAHESHWARAYYA UDASIMATH, AGE: 16 YEARS, (MINOR), OCC: STUDENT, R/O: VIJAYANAGAR, HALIYAL ROAD, DAHRWA-580023, REPRESENTED BY NATURAL GUARDIAN MOTHER I.E. SMT. UMA W/O. VEERAMAHESWARAYYA UDASIMATH. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SHIVASAI M. PATIL, ADVOCATE) AND: VEERAMAHESWARAYYA S/O. RAJESHAKHARAYYA UDASIMATH, AGE: 53 YEARS, OCC: SERVICE, R/O: VIJAYANAGAR, HALIYAL ROAD, DAHRWAD-580023. …RESPONDENT THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE WRIT OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 16/01/2020 IN O.S.NO.55/2019 VIDE ANNEXURE-“J” PASSED BY THE IV ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, DHARWAD, BY ALLOWING THE I.A.NO.III FILED U/O VI RULE 17 OF CPC VIDE ANNEXURE-B AND ETC. ASHPAK KASHIMSA MALAGALADINNI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:960 WP No. 144485 of 2020 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) 1. The petitioners are before this Court seeking the following reliefs: 1. Issue writ of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 16/01/2020 in O.S.No.55/2019 vide Annexure-“J” passed by the IV Addl. Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Dharwad, by allowing the I.A.NO.III filed U/o VI Rule 17 of CPC vide Annexure-B. 2. Pass such other order or direction as this Hon’ble deems just and proper under the facts and circumstances of case including award of cost in interest of justice and equity. 2 Memo dated 20.01.2025 has been filed signed by the counsel for the petitioners, which reads as under : “The petitioners are not interested to prosecute the matter. Hence, the petitioners may kindly be permitted to withdraw this writ petition in the interest of justice. Hence, this memo of withdrawal” 3. Accepting the said memo, petition is dismissed as withdrawn. SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE CKK