Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Cr.MP(M) No. : 2301 of 2025
Decided on : 04.06.2026
Allah Rakha
.…Petitioner.
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh.
…Respondent.
Coram
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kaintha, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1
For the petitioner : Mr. Surinder Saklani, Advocate.
For the respondents : Mr. Ajit Sharma, Deputy
Advocate General, for the
respondent.
: Ms. Godawari, Legal Aid
Counsel, for the victim.
Rakesh Kainthla, Judge (Oral)
It has been submitted that the petitioner is no more required for investigation. Considering the nature of the allegations made against him, the present application
1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2
is allowed and the order dated 17.09.2025 is made absolute.
2.
Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s) if any.
(Rakesh Kainthla)
Judge 4th June, 2026 (sushma)