1 APHC010438672025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 22465/2025 Between: 1. VARRE NARASIMHA MURTHI, S/O VARRE VENKUNAIDU, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC R/O H.NO. 1-1, MAIN ROAD, M B PATNAM, NATHAVARAM MANDALAM, MALLUBHUPALA PATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRL. SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRATARAIT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANAKAPALLI, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NARSIPATNAM, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, NATHAVARAM POLICE STATION, NATHAVARAM MANDALAM, ANAKAPALLIDISTRICT. 5. NIRJOGI NOOKARAJU, S/O NIRJOGI MATHUNAIDU, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, R/O MALLU BHUPALAPATNAM VILLAGE, NATHAVARAM MANDALAM, ANKAPALLI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SRAVAN KUMAR NAIDANA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring in action of the respondents particularly 4th respondent on petitioner representation dated 19.06.2025 and not to consider the petitioner representation and investigation against the 2 respondent No.5 as illegal arbitrary unjustified contrary to law and consequently direct the respondents particularly 4th respondent herein to consider the petitioner representation dated 19.06.2025 against the respondent No.5 and according to law to the guidelines issued in Lalita Kumari vs State of Uttar Pradesh” 2. Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that the dispute between both the parties is purely civil in nature. 3. In that view, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the petitioner is at liberty to work out his remedies before the appropriate forum, in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. __________________________________ Dr.VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J Date: 01.09.2025 Asr 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.22465 of 2025 Dt.01.09.2025 Asr