APHC010438872025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 22874/2025 Between: 1. PALLEKONDA RAJARATNAM, S/O MUNEYYA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, PRIVATE EMPLOYEE, R/O D.NO.2-165, KONDUBHOTLAVARIPALEM(V), BAPATIA MANDAL, BAPATIA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIET BUILDING, AMARAVATI. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, BAPATLA, BAPATLA DISTRICT. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, , BAPATLA, BAPATLA DIST. 4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, BAPATLA TWON P.S., BAPATLA, BAPATIA DISTRICT. 5. CHINTAM GUMMALLA NAIDU, S/O VEERAIAH, AGE 50 YEARS, R/O D.NO.3-266, VIJAYALAKSHMIPURAM, BAPTLA, BAPATIA DIST. 6. BURLA RAMASUBBA RAO, S/O NOT KNOWN, AGED 59 YEARS, VIVEKANANDA COLONY, BAPATLA TOWN, BAPATLA DISTRICT. 7. TADIKAMALLA VENKATESH, S/O SATYANARAYANA, AGED 39 YEARS, R/O VIJAYALAKSHMIPURAM, BAPATLA TOWN, BAPATLA 2 DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. N A RAMACHANDRA MURTHY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 22874 of 2025 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the 4th respondent in registering the complaint dt.22- 03-2025 lodged by the petitioner against the unofficial respondents is illegal, arbitrary, capricious, violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India. Consequently, direct the 4th respondent to register the complaint lodged by the petitioner and take action in accordance with law and to pass such....” 2. Heard Sri N A Ramachandra Murthy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home on written instructions would submit that basing on the complaint given by the petitioner, preliminary enquiry was conducted. Thereafter, it came to light that the subject matter is of civil in nature and there is no truth in the allegations made. That is why, the police have not registered any case against the unofficial respondents. . 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that recording the same, the petition may be disposed of. 4. Recording the above said submission, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. However, the petitioner is at liberty to workout his remedies before the appropriate forum. 4 As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 01.09.2025. UPS 5 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.22874 of 2025 Dated.01.09.2025 UPS 89