Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 30391 (KAR)

SRI. B. L. RAJAPPA, v. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

WA/971/2023 · 2025-10-15

Anu Sivaraman, Vijaykumar A Patil

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2024:KHC:44180-DB WA No. 971 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2024 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR WRIT APPEAL NO. 971 OF 2023 (SC-ST) BETWEEN: SRI. B.L. RAJAPPA S/O LATE LAKSHMAIAH AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS R/AT SHAKTHI NAGAR BETTAHALASUR POST, JALA HOBLI BANGALORE NORTH TALUK-562 157 …APPELLANT (BY SRI. PRASHANTH KUMAR ADVOCATE FOR SRI. SHIVAKUMAR D.A, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT BANGALORE - 560 009 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER DODDABALLAPUR SUB-DIVISION DODDABALLAPUR-561 203 3. SRI. PILLANJANAPPA S/O LATE MUNIDODDAIAH AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS 4. SRI. RAJAGOPAL S/O LATE MUNIDODDAIAH AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS Digitally signed by SHAKAMBARI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2024:KHC:44180-DB WA No. 971 of 2023 RESPONDENTS NO.3 AND 4 ARE R/AT YELIYUR VILLAGE CHANNARAYAPATNA HOBLI DEVANAHALLI TALUK BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT-562 157 5. SRI. MUNIYAPPA S/O SRI. MUNISHAMAPPA AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS 6. SMT. ANJINAMMA W/O LATE THAMMANNA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS 7. SMT. SHANTHAMMA D/O LATE THAMMANNA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS 8. SMT. SUMITHRA D/O LATE THAMMANNA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS 9. SMT. MANJULA D/O LATE THAMMANNA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS 10. SMT. SHYLAJA D/O LATE THAMMANNA AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS RESPONDENTS NO.5 TO 10 ARE RESIDING AT YELIYUR VILLAGE CHANNARAYAPATNA HOBLI DEVANAHALLI TALUK BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT-562 157 …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT APPEAL FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION QUASHING THE ORDER DATED 05.08.2019 IN NO.LND/ - 3 - NC: 2024:KHC:44180-DB WA No. 971 of 2023 SC-ST/10/2014-15 AND NO.LND/SC-ST/11/2014-15 PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT-DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT, BANGALORE, AS PER ANNEXURE-'B' AND ETC. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT and HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT) Learned counsel Sri Prashanth Kumar for Sri Shivakumar D.A., appearing for the appellant prays for further time to comply the office objections by submitting that cost imposed on 21.10.2024 has been paid. 2. This appeal is being listed for compliance of office objections for 6th time. Without compliance of office objections, cost paid cannot be accepted. - 4 - NC: 2024:KHC:44180-DB WA No. 971 of 2023 3. The purpose of imposing cost is to see that office objections are attended to. As the office objections are not complied, appeal stands dismissed. Sd/- (S.G.PANDIT) JUDGE Sd/- (RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR) JUDGE SK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 6