Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 30388 (ALL)

MAYANK SAXENA v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

BAIL/9498/2025 · 2025-03-20

Ashutosh Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:41468 Court No. - 68 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9498 of 2025 Applicant :- Mayank Saxena Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Sarve Nazir,Zafar Abbas Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Ashutosh Srivastava,J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, Shri Rakesh Kumar Gupta, learned AGA for the State-respondents and perused the record. This bail application under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been moved on behalf of accused- applicant, Mayank Saxena , seeking enlargement on bail in Case Crime No. 17 of 2025 , under Sections 308 (3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, Section 4 (2) of POCSO Act, Section 67 of Information Technology Act, Police Station Kotwali Hathras , District Hathras. Learned counsel for the applicant argued that the accused- applicant is innocent. He has been falsely implicated in this very case crime number and is languishing in jail since 18.1.2025. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that allegations of sexual intercourse has been levelled against the co-accused Lakshya. Only allegations of making videograph has been levelled against the applicant. The applicant has been falsely implicated in this case due to ulterior motive. He has no criminal antecedent and there is no likelihood of his fleeing from course of justice or tampering with evidence in case of release on bail. Hence, bail has been prayed for. Learned AGA has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail. Considering all above facts and circumstances, the nature of accusations, severity of the punishment in the case of conviction and nature of supporting evidence, reasonable apprehension of tampering with the witness and prima facie case, but without commenting on merit of case, a case for bail is made out. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. Let the accused-applicant, Mayank Saxena , involved in above mentioned case crime number be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and two reliable sureties each, in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant will not tamper with the evidence. 2. The applicant will not indulge in any criminal activity. 3. The applicant will not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witnesses and co-operate in the trial. 4. The applicant will appear regularly on each and every date fixed by the trial court, unless his personal appearance is exempted through counsel by the court concerned. In the event of breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the court below will be at liberty to proceed to cancel his bail. Order Date :- 21.3.2025 Ravi Prakash (Ashutosh Srivastava, J.) Digitally signed by :- RAVI PRAKASH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad