Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 30381 (RAJ)

NATVAR SINGH S/O HARI RAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/14033/2025 · 2025-09-15

Mahendar Kumar Goyal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:37340] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14033/2025 Natvar Singh S/o Hari Ram, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Village Warispur, Tehsil Ramgarh, District Alwar, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. District Collector (Land Record), District Alwar, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Kiran Yadav For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL Order 15/09/2025 This writ petition is filed seeking a direction to the respondents to pay the petitioner enhanced subsistence allowance in terms of proviso to Rule 53 (1) (a) of the Rajasthan Service Rules, 1951. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he was suspended under Rule 13 of the Rajasthan Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1958 vide order dated 31.10.2023 and despite expiry of the period of eleven months therefrom, he is still being paid 50% of the salary as subsistence allowance. Inviting attention of this Court towards the representations dated 15.05.2024, 10.07.2024, 22.01.2025 and 17.07.2025, he submits that despite submission of the [2025:RJ-JP:37340] (2 of 2) [CW-14033/2025] representations by him to the District Collector, Alwar to pay him subsistence allowance as per the Rules, no heed has been paid. Since, the representations filed by the petitioner have not been decided till date, this writ petition is disposed of in following terms without issuing notice to the respondents taking in view the letter and spirit of a Coordinate Bench order of this Court dated 02.02.2024 passed in the case of Pawan Meena Vs. The State of Rajasthan and Others: SB Civil Writ Petition No.1665/2024:- “The respondent No.2 is directed to pass a reasoned and speaking order on the representations filed by the petitioner within a period of two weeks from the date of submission of a copy of this order and if the petitioner is not found to be entitled for enhanced subsistence allowance in terms of Proviso to Rule 53 (1) (a) of the Rajasthan Services Rules, 1951 after the expiry of six months, the order shall contain specific reasons thereof. If the petitioner is found entitled, he shall forthwith be paid arrears of the enhanced subsistence allowance within a period of a week from the date of the order.” Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J DIKSHA /59