[2025:JHHC:21148] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No.3149 of 2011 ------ 1. Rajgupta Giri, S/o Late Dukhiram Giri, resident of village Khamardih, P.S. Jadugora, District Singhbhum East. 2. Sri Tota Rukmangad, s/o Late T Ananth Rao, sole proprietor of M/s Trimuruthi Enterprises carrying out business and resident of 2- A, Rajendra Nagar, Sakchi, P.O. & P.S. Sakchi, Jamshedpur, District Singhbhum East. … Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand, through Secretary Department of Registration, Engineers Building, Sector-III, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi. 2. Inspector General of Registration, Government of Jharkhand, Engineers’ Building, Sector-III, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi. 3. Deputy Commissioner cum District Registrar, Jamshedpur, District Singhbhum East. 4. District Sub Registrar, Jamshedpur, District Singhbhum East. … Respondents With W.P.(C). No.4474 of 2010 ------ Santosh Kumar Agrawal, son of late Shyam Sundar Agrawal, resident of Patel Nagar, P.O.- Bhurkunda, P.S.- Patratu, District- Ramgarh (Jharkhand) … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand through the Secretary, Department of Registration, Engineers’ Building, Sector-III, P.O. & P.S.- Dhurwa, Ranchi, District- Ranchi. 2. The Inspector General of Registration, Government of Jharkhand, Engineers’ Building, Sector-III, P.O. & P.S.- Dhurwa, Ranchi, District- Ranchi. 3. The Deputy Commissioner-cum-District Registrar, Ramgarh, P.O. +P.S.+District- Ramgarh (Jharkhand). 4. The District Sub Registrar, Ramgarh, P.O. + P.S. + District- Ramgarh (Jharkhand). … Respondents ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : None For the Respondents : Mr. Manish Kumar, Sr. SC II Mr. A. Bhushan, AC to Sr. SC II Mr. Rahul Saboo, GP II Mr. Abhilash Kumar, AC to GP II ------ Order No:-10 Dated:-30-07-2025 No one turns up on behalf of the petitioners in spite of repeated calls. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that since there is no merit in these Writ Petitions, hence, the petitioners are not diligent in prosecuting these Writ Petitions. Accordingly, these Writ Petitions are dismissed for non-prosecution. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Saroj/