JOSEF MURMU ALIAS JOSEPH MURMU v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./11056/2024 · 2025-03-11
Ambuj Nath
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 30372 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 30372 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A No. 11056 of 2024
Josef Murmu @ Joseph Murmu, aged about 36 years, S/o Markush Murmu, Resident of Village Piyaram, P.O and P.S. Lalmatia, District Godda
---
--- Petitioner Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand
2. Vishal Soren, S/o Late Dharmu Soren, resident of Village Naya Bhodai, P.O and P.S. Lalmatiya, District Godda--- --- Opp. Parties --- CORAM: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ambuj Nath
---
For the Petitioner: Mr. S.P. Roy, Advocate
For the O.P-State: Mr. Azeemuddin, A.P.P.
For the O.P. No. 2: Mr. Pankaj Kr. Choudhary, Advocate --- 03 / 11.03.2025 Heard the parties.
2. Petitioner has been made accused in connection with Lalmatiya P.S. Case No. 41 of 2024 for the offences registered under sections 406/420/34 of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the court of Sri Satish Kumar Munda, learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Godda.
3. Petitioner is alleged to have duped several persons on the promise of getting them job.
4. It appears that the Informant has paid Rs. 1.20 lakh by Google Pay to the petitioner. It further appears that several persons have given huge amount of money to the petitioner.
6. Considering the nature of allegation, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, his prayer for bail stands rejected.
(Ambuj Nath, J) Ranjeet/ Uploaded