e* AP^COI 0437012023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 22576 OF 2023 Between: B Venkatesh, S/o Subrahmanyam, Aged about 38 years, Occ Agriculture, R/o D.No. 1-115, Pudipatia Village, Puditala Gram Panchayath, Tirupati Rural Mandal, Tirupati (Chittoor) District ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by it's Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration AND Urban Development, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 2. The Tirupati Urban Development Authority, Rep by it's Vice-Chairman, TUDA Office, Tirupati, Tirupati District. 3. The District Collector, Tirupati District, Tirupati. 4. The Tahsildar, Tirupati Rural Mandal, Tirupati, Tirupati District. 5. The Superintendent Engineer, Irrigation Department Tirupati, Tirupati District. 6. The Panchayat Secretary, Pudipatia Grampanchayat, Pudipatia Village, Tirupati Rural Mandal, Tirupati. / ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in , the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd Respondent in issuing the ^Tentative Layout Plan vide File No 1166/00101/LP/TU DA/2022, dt 17.05.2022 is arbitrary, illegal, violation of Principles of Natural Justice, besides contrary to the A.P Land Development (Layout and sub-Division) Rules, 2017 apart from infraction of Article 21 of the Constitution of India and also against the well settled legal principles reported in 2011(11)SCC,396 AND AIR, 2001,SC,3215 and consequently set aside the Tentative Layout Plan vide File No 1166/00101/LP/TUDA/2022, dt 17.05.2022 issued by the 2nd Respondent lA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased please to direct the 2nd Respondent to dispose of the petitioner's objections dt:26.06.2023 in respect of Tentative Layout Plan vide File No:1166/00101/LP/TUDA/2022, dt: 17.05.2022 with in the period of 8 weeks, pending disposal of the above writ petition in the interest of justice. lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated jn the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd Respondent Not to Grant Final Layout Approval for the Tentative Layout Plan vide File No;n66/00101/LP/TUDA/2022, dt; 17.05.2022 for an extent of Ac. 1.0429 cts in Sy.No. 547 of Pudipatla Village, Tirupati Rural Mandal, Tirupati District (Erstwhile Chittoor District) till the disposal of the W.P.No. 22576 of 2023 Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI KORAMUTLA SALINI Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI MUNI REDDY PERURU Counsel for the Respondents No.3, 4: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.5: GP IRRIGATION AND COMM AREA Counsel for the Respondent No.6: SRI G VENKAT REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.7: O UDAYA KUMAR The Court made the following order: APHC010437012023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] MONDAY ,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 22576/2023 Between; 1.B VENKATESH, S/0 SUBRAHMANYAM, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, R/0 D.NO. 1-115, PUDIPATLA VILLAGE, PUDITALA GRAM PANCHAYATH, TIRUPATI RURAL MANDAL, TIRUPATI (CHITTOOR) DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY IT'S PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. URBAN DEVELOPMENT 2.THE TIRUPATI URBAN DEVELOPEMENT AUTHORITY, REP BY IT'S VICE-CHAIRMAN, TUDA OFFICE, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 3.THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, , TIRUPATI DISTRICT, TIRUPATI. 4.THE TAHSILDAR, TIRUPATI RURAL MANDAL, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 5.THE SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER, IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 6.THE PUDIPATLA GRAMPANCHAYAT, REP BY IT'S PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, PUDIPATLA VILLAGE, TIRUPATI RURAL MANDAL, tirupati. BUSINESsIr/o'^H Mn RAMA NAIDU, real estate tirupati rural ■■.RESPONDENT(S): Circu::“rersttedtthe ^-Ving .ha. in .he pleased .opieased .0 ise„» ™ ^ ^ therewi.h, .he High Court may be one in .he^ na.:t o^ W^. d Respondent in issuing ,hi ""‘'O" '^e 2nd II66/OOIOI/UP/TUS2 d, nt1o22 Principles of Natural Justice besidpc:' ^''bitrary, illegal, violation (Layout AND sub-DivfeioIfR„er 2017^17. Land'oeveloplnt 2011(11)300,396 1^ A,r?o'ofs'c3i:6^^?'' " Tentative Layout Plan vide Fik m ’-h^’o/ ^ consequently set aside the issued by .he 2nd Respo^n^ « 1^ °5.2022 No of jA NO: 1 OF 909-^ Petition under Section the affidavit filed in support’omeTeltiom"®!^!‘^'''oonnstances stated i. to direct the 2nd Respond^, t ® P'oose dt:26.06.2023 in respect of T TT® petitioner's objections No:1166/00101/LP/TUDA/2022 dt I70T2I22 ''''® pending disposal oftheabovewritULl^irerrer.:^^^^^^^^^ of 8 wee.s, jA NO: 1 OF 9no^ Petition under Section 151 CPp the affidavit filed in support of the eircumstances stated in direct the 2nd Respondent not ,o Qrat r ' ot Layout Plan vide File No:n66/00101/LPm'i'mn''°''‘ ^PP™''®' tor the Tentative of Ac.1.0429 cts in Sy.No 547 of l a " Tirupati District (Erstwhile Chittoor DisWrrt rl 1 ^^"^ai, of 2023 and pass disposal of the W.P.No. 22576 Counsel for the Petitioner; in 1.K0RAMUTLA SALINI Counsel for the Respondent(S); 1.GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV 2.GP FOR REVENUE 3.0 UDAYA KUMAR 4. (SC FOR TUDA) 5.GP FOR IRRIGATION COMM AREA DEV The Court made the following: HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY Writ Petition No. 22576 of 2023 THE ORDER: dated 24.06.2025 filed by the learned counsel ion of this Court to 1. In view of the Memo Petitioner(s) before the Registry seeking permission for withdraw the Writ Petition, permission for withdrawal is accorded. is dismissed as withdrawn. There 2. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is shall be no order as to costs. , miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand As a sequel dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- P. VINOD KUMAR assistant registrar ■tI^FFICER //true copy// SEC \ To, One CC to SRI KORAMUTLA SALINI Advocate [OPUC] GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV High Court of 1. Two CCs to Andhra Pradesh [OUT] ,, u rr^\ iti Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] One CC to SRI O UDAYA KUMAR Advocate [OPUC] CC to SRI MUNI REDDY PERURU (SC FOR TUDA) Advocate 2. 3. 4. One [OPUC] Two ^ Andhra Pradesh [OUT] Two CD Copies 5. CCs to GP FOR IRRIGATION COMM AREA DEV High Court of 6. 7. gsg HIGH COURT DATED: 30/06/2025 ORDER WP NO. 22576 OF 2023 DISMISSING THE WP AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS