IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI FRIDAY, THE SEVENTHDAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSANDAND TWENTYFIVE O' -n X M PRESENT HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SURESH REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 6 OF 2025 Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court be pleased to aggrieved by the non-disposal of I.A. No. 336 of 2024 in I.A. No. 264 of 2018 in O.S. No. 254 of 2011 on the file of the Court of learned IV Additional District Judge, Tirupati. may Between: R. Ramachandra Reddy, S /o R. Kannaiah Reddy, Aged 76 years, R/o. D.No. 13-1-196, P.K. Layout (Maszid Lane), Tirupati, Chittoor District. ...PETITIONER/PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF AND 1. R. Sarojamma, W/o Late R. Venkatesam Reddy, Aged 69 years. Residing at D.No.19-12-172, Bairagipatteda, Tirupati, Chittoor District. 2. R. Suryanarayana Reddy, S/o Late R. Venkatesam Reddy Aged 50 years. Residing at D.No.19-12-172, Bairagipatteda, Tirupati, Chittoor District. 3. R. Jyothi, W/o Late R. Purushotham Reddy, Aged 42 years. Residing at D.No.328, “D” Type, Vinayakanagar Quarters, Tirupati, Chittoor District. r 4. R. Narayana Reddy, S/o Late R. Purushotham Reddy, Aged 22 years. Residing at D.No.328, D Type, Vinayakanagar Quarters, Tirupati, Chittoor District. 5. R. Rajitha,, D/o Late R. Purushotham Reddy, Aged 21 years. Residing at D.No.328, D Type, Vinayakanagar Quarters, Tirupati, Chittoor District. 6. M. Rajyalakshmi, , W/o M. Venkata Reddy, Aged 52 years. Residing at D.N0.13-6-694C, Peddakapu Layout, Tirupati, Chittoor District 7. M. Pushpalatha, , W/o M. Muni Reddy, Aged 46 years. Residing at D.No.12-2-89 Upstairs, Nimmakayala Street, Tirupati, Chittoor District. 8. I Venkatasubbamma,, W/o I. Madhava Reddy, Aged 45 years. Residing at D.No. 141, T.P. Area, Tirupati, Chittoor District. ...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS Counsel for the Petitioner : M/S NIMMAGADDA REVATHI Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1,6 and 8 : SRI PAWAN KUMAR MALAPATI The Court made the following ORDER : r APHC010437322024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3239] THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SURESH REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 6/2025 Between: R. Ramachandra Reddy ...PETITIONER AND R Sarojamma and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: ...RESPONDENT(S) 1.NIMMAGADDA REVATHI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.PAWAN KUMAR MALAPATI The Court made the following: The petitioner / plaintiff, who is seeking an innocuous relief in not disposing of I.A.No.336 of 2024 in I.A.No.264 of 2018 in O.S.No.254 of 2011 on the file of learned IV Additional District Judge, Tirupati, has filed the present Civil Revision Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner filed O.S.No.254 of 2011 against the respondents herein seeking partition of the suit schedule property. A preliminary decree was passed on 10.08.2017. Thereafter, the petitioner / plaintiff filed I.A.No.264 of 2018 for passing the final decree. During pendency of the said final decree proceedings, the petitioner filed I.A.No.336 of 2024 in I.A.No.264 of 2018 in O.S.No.254 of 2011 seeking to appoint a Court Commissioner to make local inspection of the schedule premises and to note down the physical features of the schedule mentioned property and grant ad-interim order. Seeking directions to the learned trial Judge to dispose of said I.A.No.336 of 2024, the present Civil Revision Petition is filed. Heard Smt. Nimmagadda Revathi, learned counsel for petitioner, and Sri Malapati Pavan Kumar, learned counsel for the respondent. 3. 4. In view of the innocuous relief sought for by the petitioner, the present Civil Revision Petition is disposed of at the admission stage directing the learned IV Additional District Judge, Tirupati, to take up I.A.No.336 of 2024 and dispose of the same in accordance with law expeditiously i.e., within a period of two (2) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, the interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Civil Revision Petition shall stand closed. SOI- A.VENUGOPALA RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The IV Additional District Judge, Tirupathi. 2. One CC to SRI. NIMMAGADDA REVATHI Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to SRI. PAWAN KUMAR MALAPATI Advocate [OPUC] 4. Three CD Copies RDB TAG HIGH COURT DATED:07/03/2025 ORDER CRP.No.6 of 2025 I 18 MAR 2025 o\ m* Ot, ^ Current seciion ^|^spatc^5^ THE CIVIL REVISION PETITION IS DISPOSED OF