2025:HHC:39282 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWPOA No.621 of 2019 Decided on: 20.11.2025 _________________________________________________________ Amar Chand ...Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Others ...Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting?. For the petitioner: Mr. Ramesh Kaundal, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Hemant K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents No.1 & 2-State. None for respondents No.3 & 4. Ranjan Sharma, Judge [Oral] Mr. Ramesh Kaundal, Advocate, Learned Counsel for the petitioner, states that despite efforts made to contact the petitioner, both in writing and telephonically, no response is forthcoming. [Statement along with Communication dated 26.04.2019 is taken on record]. 2. In these circumstances, Learned Counsel submits that it appears that the petitioner does not intend to pursue the matter and, accordingly, prays that the proceedings may be closed. 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2025:HHC:39282 - 2 - 3. Prayer, being innocuous, is not opposed by the Learned State Counsel. In view of the above, the instant petition is closed. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (Ranjan Sharma) Judge November 20, 2025 [Shivender]