APHC010436932018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY ,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI WRIT PETITION Between: W.danial, The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. VELAGANI NARASIMHULU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION (AP) The Court made the following: IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY ,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 20395/2018 ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: VELAGANI NARASIMHULU Counsel for the Respondent(S): GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION (AP) The Court made the following: [3396] MONDAY ,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF MARCH THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI ...PETITIONER ...RESPONDENT(S) ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents particularly the action of the 2nd and 3rd respondents in passing the proceedings in RC No 518/APMS/2018 dt 11 5 2018 by the 2nd respondent and up on the impugned proceedings passed by the 3rd respondent in Rc No 2255/B3/2018 dt 2 6 2018 in removing the petitioner from the post of Full Additional ChargePrincipal FAC Principal in A P Model School Penagaluru Kadapa District and placing the 5th respondent as senior most than the petitioner is arbitrary illegal and against to the rule of Seniority and against to provisions of A P State Subordinate Service Rules1996 and consequently set aside the proceedings in RC No 518/APMS/2018 dt 11 5 2018 of the 2nd respondent and the impugned proceedings in Rc No 2255/B3/2018 dt 2 6 2018 issued by the 3rd respondent and pass…” 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for School Education on behalf of the respondents is in attendance. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that no further orders are required and the petition may be disposed of since the relief has become infructuous in this matter. 4. Recording the above said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________________ Dr. VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J Date: 24.3.2024 TJN 183 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 20395 OF 2018 Dated: 24.03.2025 TJN HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI Writ Petition No.20395 of 2018 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. No DATE ORDER OFFICE NOTE 02. 24.03.2025 Dr.VJP, J The Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Vide Separate Order) _________ Dr.VJP, J TJN