Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:60793 Court No. - 66 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 10025 of 2025 Applicant :- Krishna Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Aishwarya Pratap Singh,Rishi Kesh Malviya Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Sameer Jain,J.
1. Heard Sri Rishi Kesh Malviya, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Imran Khan, learned AGA, for the State.
2. The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant with the prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No.439 of 2024, under Sections 105, 115(2) and 352 BNS, Police Station Hathras Junction, District Hathras during pendency of the trial.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that on the basis of false allegation applicant has been made accused in the present matter along with others including co-accused Shiv Singh @ Satta Thakur and after considering entire facts in detail co-accused Shiv Singh @ Satta Thakur has been released on bail by this Court and his bail order has been annexed as Annexure-8 to the affidavit filed in support of the instant bail application and on facts case of applicant is at par with him.
4. He further submits that however, apart from the present case applicant is also having criminal history of two other cases but out of two cases one case is of Goondas Act and entire criminal history of the applicant has been explained in the instant bail application and in the present matter he is in jail since 26.12.2024.
5. Per contra, learned AGA however opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the argument on facts advanced by the
learned counsel for the applicant.
6. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record of the case.
7. Considering the argument advanced by the learned counsel for the applicant and the fact that co-accused Shiv Singh @ Satta Thakur has already been released on bail by this Court and on facts case of applicant is at par with him and criminal history of the applicant has been explained in the instant bail application and in the present matter he is in jail since 26.12.2024, in my view, applicant is entitled to be released on bail.
8. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the instant bail application is allowed.
9. Let the applicant-Krishna be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant shall appear before the trial court on the dates fixed, unless his personal presence is exempted. (ii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly, make inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or any police officer or tamper with the evidence. (iii) The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal and anti-social activity.
10. In case of breach of any of the above condition, the prosecution will be at liberty to move an application before this Court for cancellation of the bail of the applicant.
11. It is clarified that the observations made herein are limited to the facts brought in by the parties pertaining to the disposal of bail application and the said observations shall have no bearing on the
merits of the case during trial.
Order Date :- 23.4.2025 SKM Digitally signed by :- SHRAVANA KUMAR MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad