APHC010438142013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE ^ PRESENT HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION No: 18938 OF 201 Between: G.Jalandhar Gowd, S/o.Sriramulu Gowd, aged about 42 Journalism, R/o. H.No.49-1-A-D-4, Lakshminagar, Kurnool-518002. years, Occ: ...PETITIONER AND 1. Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2. The Andhra Pradesh State Housing Corporation, Rep. by its Managing Director, Urdu Galli, Himayathnagar, Hyderabad. 3. The Project Director, A.P. State Housing Corporation Sankshema Bhavan, Birla Gate, Kurnool-518 002. 4. Kurnool Municipal Corporation, rep. by its Commissioner, N.R. Pet, Kurnool-518 004. 5. The Tahsildar, Kallur Mandal, Krishna Nagar, Kurnool-518 002. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the the High Court may be circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one of the authorities petitioner herein from plot bearing No. 12, admeasuring 0.05 cents in Sy.No.709/1A, situated at Kallur village and Mandal, Kurnool District, without issuing any notice and without in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS, to declare the action of the respondents in threatening to dispossess the f following the due process of Law^s being illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the respondent^ not to dispossess or in any manner interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner. lA No: 1 OF 2013fWVMP 3994 OF 2013 Between: The Kurnool Municipal Corporation, Kurnool rep. by its Commissioner, Kurnool. ...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT No.4 AND G.Jalandhar Gowd, S/o.Sriramulu Gowd, aged about 42 years, Occ: Journalism, R/o. H.No.49-1-A-D-4, Lakshminagar, Kurnool-518002. Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department Secretariat, Hyderabad. The Andhra Pradesh State Housing Corporation, Rep. by its Managing Director, Urdu Galli, Himayathnagar, Hyderabad. 4. The Project Director, A.P. State Housing Corporation Sankshema Bhavan, Birla Gate, Kurnool-518 002. 5. The Tahsildar, Kallur Mandal, Krishtia Nagar, Kurnool-518 002. ^..RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders passed in WPMP.No.23158 2013 in W.P.No.18938 of 2013 dated 02-07-2013. lA NO: 2 OF 2013(WPMP 23158 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the authorities of the respondents not to dispossess or in any manner interfere with the possession and enjoyment of the petitioner in respect of the plot bearing No. 12, admeasuring 0.05 cents in Sy.No.709/1A, situated at 1. 2. 3. / Kallur Village and Mandel, Kurnool District, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI BABUJI TENNETI Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 & 5: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 & 3: SRI M.RAVINDRANATH REDDY, SC FOR APSHC Counsel for the Respondent No.4: SRI B.HANUMANTHA RAO, SC FOR KUR NEL MC The Court made the following: ORDER / APHC010438142013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] TUESDAY ,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDy SATTI I WRIT PETITION NO: 18938/2013 Between: .G.jalandhar Gowd ...PETITIONER AND Government Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.BABUJI TENNETI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.B HANUMANTHA RAO (SC FOR KUR&NEL MC) 2.GP FOR REVENUE 3.M RAVINDRANATH REDDY(SC FOR APSHC) 4.B HANUMANTHA RAO (SC FOR KUR NEL MC) The Court made'the following ORDER: Sri Babuji Tenneti, learned counsel for the petitioner appeared through ’ virtual mode and submitted that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and hence, the writ petition has rendered infructuous. ...RESPONDENT(S) 2. Recording the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- K KASIRAO ACHARI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To, 1. OneCCto Sri Babuji Tenneti, Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCs GP for Revenue, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT One CC to Sri M.Ravindranath Reddy, SC for APSHC.[OPUC] One CC to Sri B.Hanumantha Rao, SC for KUR NEL MC.[OPUC] Two CD Copies. 3. 4. 5. gi HIGH COURT DATED:24/06/2025 \ \ 2IAUe2025 s ^ . Current Section ORDER WP.No.18938 of 2013 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS