APHC010437632023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.22683/2023 BETWEEN: 1. NEKKALAPU VENKATA RAVI KUMAR, S/O. N. NAGESWARA RAO, AGED 32 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. H.NO. 1-364, PLOT NO. 9, VISALAKSHI NAGAR, VISAKHAPATNAM URBAN, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT,4TH BLOCK, GROUND FLOOR, A.P SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS,AMARAVATHI. VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT, ANAKAPALLI. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, , ANAKAPALLI DIVISION, ANAKAPALLI. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, ANAKAPALLIMANDAL, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT. 5. THE MANDAL SURVEYOR, ANAKAPALLI MANDAL, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT. 6. THE VILLAGE REVENUE OFFICER, KANDUPALEM VILLAGE, ANAKAPALLI MANDAL, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT. 7. VEDULA LAKSHMI NARASIMHA CHENNULU CHENULU, S/O LATE SUBRAMANYA CHENNULU, AGED 65 YEARS, OCC PRIVATE EMPLOYEE, R/O FLAT No. 207, VENKATADRI 2 TOWERS, VIVEKANANDA NAGAR COLONY, KUKATPALLY , HYDERABAD. R7 IS IMPLEADED AS PER THE COURT ORDER DT.23.07.2024 VIDE ORDERS PASSED IN I.A.NO. 02 OF 2023. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, writ or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondent authorities in taking steps/attempting to dispossess the petitioner from his land in R.S.No. 205-1 to an extent of Ac. 3-30 cents, R.S.No. 205-2 to an extent of Ac. 1-80 cents total to an extent of Ac. 5- 10 cents situated at Kandupalem Village, Anakapalli Mandal, Anakapalli District without giving any notice and without following due process of law and also conducting survey without notice and any manner of right is illegal, arbitrary is illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14, 21 and 300-A Constitution of India and consequently declare that therespondent authorities cannot dispossess the petitioner from his land in the name of third parties interest without following due process of law and pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 2. SRICHARAN TELAPROLU The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: Despite, the Writ Petition is listed under the caption “for dismissal”, there is no representation for the Writ Petitioner. This Court presumes that the Writ Petitioner has no interest to prosecute the Writ Petition. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 24.09.2025 Harin 4 62 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO W.P.No. 22683 OF 2023 Date: 24-09-2025 Harin