M/S B T C INDUSTRIES LTD v. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER STATE TAX
WPMS/632/2025 · 2025-03-06
Ravindra Maithani
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3035 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3035 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s
order with Signatures
COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
WPMS No.632 of 2025 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. Mr. Bhupesh Kandpal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Mohit Maulekhi, Brief Holder for the State. The petitioner seeks direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order DEC- 7A dated 08.01.2025, passed by the respondent and in alternate direction has been sought that the appellant authority may be directed to expedite and decide the statutory appeal. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that against the impugned order dated 08.01.2025, an appeal has already been preferred, which has yet not been disposed of. Learned State counsel would submit that till 27.02.2025, the appeal was defective. But, it has now been cured by the petitioner and the appeal is listed for hearing on 11.03.2025. The petitioner may very well participate in the appeal. There is no need to say that every appeal and petition should be decided as expeditiously as possible. This Court has no doubt that the appeal preferred by the petitioner will find expeditious disposal. With the above observation, the writ petition stands disposed of.
(Ravindra Maithani, J.) 06.03.2025 Sanjay