Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 30347 (RAJ)

OMPAL SINGH S/O SHRI DHUDSINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMP/6038/2025 · 2025-09-20

Sudesh Bansal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:38974] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 6038/2025 Ompal Singh S/o Shri Dhudsingh, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Juliyasar, P.s. Nechhwa, Sikar ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. 2. Sampta Kumar @ Boduram S/o Madan Lal, Through Its Legal Heir Kushal (Victim) R/o Juliyasar, P.s. Nechhwa, Sikar ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajendra Gautam For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP Mr. Rajneesh Gurjar HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 20/09/2025 1. It has been submitted that respondent No.2-complainant has entered into compromise with all the accused persons, namely, Mangu Singh, Ompal Singh, Surendra Singh and Bodhu Singh and the compromise has been attested by the trial Court in respect of offences u/s. 323 & 342 IPC only, but has been denied in respect of offences u/s. 147, 149 and 324 IPC, being non-compoundable offences. 2. Instant petition has been filed by one of the accused namely Ompal Singh, for quashing of FIR No.132/2017 registered at Police Station Nechhwa, Sikar, on the basis of compromise. 3. Counsel for petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition with liberty to file afresh alongwith other co-accused with [2025:RJ-JP:38974] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-6038/2025] whom respondent No.2- complainant has entered into compromise. 4. In view of above, the instant petition is allowed to be withdrawn and same is hereby disposed of with the liberty as prayed for. 5. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (SUDESH BANSAL),J Sachin/69