Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 30347 (CHH)

XYZ v. AVANISH MISHRA

CRMP/1322/2022 · 2025-08-07

Shri Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:39763 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 1322 of 2022 1 - Xyz Nil ... Petitioner versus 1 - Avanish Mishra S/o Ramashankar Mishra Aged About 28 Years R/o Quarter No. AZ-49, Asma Colony, Phase-II, Sakri, Police Station Sakari, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Station House Officer, Police Station Sarkanda, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioner : None. For State : Mr. Pranjal Shukla, P.L. For Respondent No. 1 : Mr. Amit Xalxo, Adv. Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal Order on Board 08 / 08 / 2025 1. This petition has been preferred by the petitioner under Section 439(2) of Cr.P.C. for cancellation of bail of respondent No.1 challenging the order dated 14.03.2022 passed by learned Special Judge (Atrocities), Bilaspur, C.G. in Crime No. 272/2022 (Avanish Mishra vs. State of C.G.), registered at Police Station – Sarkanda, District – Bilaspur, Digitally signed by HEERA LAL SAHU Date: 2025.08.11 11:09:43 +0530 2 under Section 376 of IPC and Section 3(2)(v) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, whereby the accused person had been granted regular bail. 2. An application under Section 439(2) Cr.P.C. has been filed by the XYZ (victim) challenging the order dated 14.03.2022, passed by Special Judge (Atrocities), Bilaspur, C.G. in Crime No. 272/2022, before Additional Sessions Judge, Bilaspur, which has dismissed vide order dated 29.06.2022. 3. No one appeared on behalf of the petitioner/victim. 4. The order is of the year 2022. By now three years have now elapsed. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No. 1/accused submitted that the trial is pending. 5. After a lapse of 3 years, there is no good ground to exercise inherent power under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. 6. In view of the above, the learned trial Court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same as expeditiously as possible. 7. With the aforesaid direction, the petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal) Judge H.L. Sahu